Literature DB >> 17391132

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance renal transplant patients.

K Budde1, S Bauer, P Hambach, U Hahn, H Röblitz, I Mai, F Diekmann, H-H Neumayer, P Glander.   

Abstract

The aim of this single-center crossover substudy was to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity] of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at steady-state conditions. Stable maintenance renal transplant patients on 1 g MMF b.i.d. participating in a double-blind, multicenter study, were randomized to receive EC-MPS (720 mg b.i.d.) or continue receiving MMF (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 12 months. Thereafter, all patients (n = 18) received 720 mg EC-MPS b.i.d. Area under the plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration-time curve with EC-MPS (57.4 +/- 15.0 microg h/mL) fulfilled bioequivalence criteria (geometric mean 0.98 (90% CI: 0.87-1.11) compared to MMF (58.4 +/- 14.1 microg h/mL). Consistent with the delayed release characteristics of EC-MPS, peak MPA concentration (geometric mean 0.89; 90% CI: 0.70-1.13) occurred approximately 0.5 h later (p < 0.05) and predose MPA levels (geometric mean 2.10; 90% CI: 1.51-2.91) were higher and more variable, not fulfilling bioequivalence criteria. IMPDH activity inversely followed MPA concentrations and was inhibited to a similar degree (approximately 85%) by both formulations. The calculated value for 50% IMPDH inhibition was identical for both drugs. In conclusion, equimolar doses of EC-MPS and MMF produce equivalent MPA exposure, while the delayed release formulation of EC-MPS exhibits more variable predose levels and T(max). Overall, IMPDH activity reflected MPA pharmacokinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17391132     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01693.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  26 in total

1.  Associations between polymorphisms in target, metabolism, or transport proteins of mycophenolate sodium and therapeutic or adverse effects in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Nicolas Picard; Antoine Thierry; Guy Touchard; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in paediatrics: age-related regulation and response to mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  A Rother; P Glander; E Vitt; D Czock; N von Ahsen; V W Armstrong; M Oellerich; K Budde; R Feneberg; B Tönshoff; L T Weber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  How accurate and precise are limited sampling strategies in estimating exposure to mycophenolic acid in people with autoimmune disease?

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Olesja Rissling; Petra Glander; Pia Hambach; Marco Mai; Susanne Brakemeier; Daniela Klonower; Fabian Halleck; Eugenia Singer; Eva-Vanessa Schrezenmeier; Michael Dürr; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The utility of trough mycophenolic acid levels for the management of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Negiin Pourafshar; Ashkan Karimi; Xuerong Wen; Eric Sobel; Shirin Pourafshar; Nikhil Agrawal; Emma Segal; Rajesh Mohandas; Mark S Segal
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase variability in renal transplant patients on long-term mycophenolate mofetil therapy.

Authors:  Laurent R Chiarelli; Mariadelfina Molinaro; Carmelo Libetta; Carmine Tinelli; Laura Cosmai; Giovanna Valentini; Antonio Dal Canton; Mario Regazzi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in patients with autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.

Authors:  J Michael Tredger; Nigel W Brown; Anil Dhawan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a review of its use in the prevention of renal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.