Literature DB >> 17388692

The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: study of errors in dosimetry.

I Thierry-Chef1, M Marshall, J J Fix, F Bermann, E S Gilbert, C Hacker, B Heinmiller, W Murray, M S Pearce, D Utterback, K Bernar, P Deboodt, M Eklof, B Griciene, K Holan, H Hyvonen, A Kerekes, M-C Lee, M Moser, F Pernicka, E Cardis.   

Abstract

To provide direct estimates of cancer risk after low-dose protracted exposure to ionizing radiation, a large-scale epidemiological study of nuclear industry workers was conducted in 15 countries. As part of this study, identification and quantification of errors in historical recorded doses was conducted based on a review of dosimetric practices and technologies in participating facilities. The main sources of errors on doses from "high-energy" photons (100-3000 keV) were identified as the response of dosimeters in workplace exposure conditions and historical calibration practices. Errors related to dosimetry technology and radiation fields were quantified to derive period- and facility-specific estimates of bias and uncertainties in recorded doses. This was based on (1) an evaluation of predominant workplace radiation from measurement studies and dosimetry expert assessment and (2) an estimation of the energy and geometry response of dosimeters used historically in study facilities. Coefficients were derived to convert recorded doses to H(p) (10) and organ dose, taking into account different aspects of the calibration procedures. A parametric, lognormal error structure model was developed to describe errors in doses as a function of facility and time period. Doses from other radiation types, particularly neutrons and radionuclide intake, could not be adequately reconstructed in the framework of the 15-Country Study. Workers with substantial doses from these radiation types were therefore identified and excluded from analyses. Doses from "lower-energy" photons (<100 keV) and from "higher-energy" photons (>3 MeV) were estimated to be small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17388692     DOI: 10.1667/RR0552.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  23 in total

1.  The healthy worker effect and nuclear industry workers.

Authors:  Krzysztof W Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  A New Era of Low-Dose Radiation Epidemiology.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Preetha Rajaraman; Estelle Ntowe; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

3.  Cohort Profile: The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; David B Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis; Robert D Daniels; Michael Gillies; Jacqueline A O'Hagan; Richard Haylock; Dominique Laurier; Klervi Leuraud; Monika Moissonnier; Mary Schubauer-Berigan; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Ausrele Kesminiene
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Relationship between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and mortality at the French electricity company, period 1961-2003.

Authors:  Olivier Laurent; Camille Metz-Flamant; Agnès Rogel; Dominique Hubert; Alexandre Riedel; Yves Garcier; Dominique Laurier
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  CONVERSION FACTOR FROM DOSEMETER READING TO AIR KERMA FOR NUCLEAR WORKER USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOM FOR FURTHER CONVERSION FROM AIR KERMA TO ORGAN-ABSORBED DOSE.

Authors:  Hiroshige Furuta; Norio Tsujimura; Akemi Nishide; Shin'ichi Kudo; Shin Saigusa
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Mortality and ionising radiation exposures among workers employed at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center (1951-1985).

Authors:  Sharon R Silver; Stephen J Bertke; Misty Jena Hein; Robert D Daniels; Donald A Fleming; Jeri L Anderson; Susan M Pinney; Richard W Hornung; Chih-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Ionizing radiation and risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the 15-country study of nuclear industry workers.

Authors:  Martine Vrijheid; Elisabeth Cardis; Patrick Ashmore; Anssi Auvinen; Ethel Gilbert; Rima R Habib; Hans Malker; Colin R Muirhead; David B Richardson; Agnes Rogel; Mary Schubauer-Berigan; Hélène Tardy; Maylis Telle-Lamberton
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  The impact of dosimetry uncertainties on dose-response analyses.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Site-specific Solid Cancer Mortality After Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: A Cohort Study of Workers (INWORKS).

Authors:  David B Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis; Robert D Daniels; Michael Gillies; Richard Haylock; Klervi Leuraud; Dominique Laurier; Monika Moissonnier; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Ausrele Kesminiene
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 10.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.