Literature DB >> 1738862

Forensic anthropology and the concept of race: if races don't exist, why are forensic anthropologists so good at identifying them?

N J Sauer1.   

Abstract

Most anthropologists have abandoned the concept of race as a research tool and as a valid representation of human biological diversity. Yet, race identification continues to be one of the central foci of forensic anthropological casework and research. It is maintained in this paper that the successful assignment of race to a skeletal specimen is not a vindication of the race concept, but rather a prediction that an individual, while alive was assigned to a particular socially constructed 'racial' category. A specimen may display features that point to African ancestry. In this country that person is likely to have been labeled Black regardless of whether or not such a race actually exists in nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738862     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90086-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

Review 1.  Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health).

Authors:  A H Goodman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Metric assessment of ancestry from the vertebrae in South Africans.

Authors:  Özge Ünlütürk
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Biogeographic Ancestry Cannot Be Unequivocally Determined.

Authors:  Andreas Winkelmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  A Qualitative Analysis of How Anthropologists Interpret the Race Construct.

Authors:  Jayne O Ifekwunigwe; Jennifer K Wagner; Joon-Ho Yu; Tanya M Harrell; Michael J Bamshad; Charmaine D Royal
Journal:  Am Anthropol       Date:  2017-08-14

5.  Inter-observer agreement on subjects' race and race-informative characteristics.

Authors:  Heather J H Edgar; Shamsi Daneshvari; Edward F Harris; Philip J Kroth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Variation in the morphology of spinous processes in the cervical spine - An objective and parametric assessment based on CT study.

Authors:  Kamil Ludwisiak; Michał Podgórski; Katarzyna Biernacka; Ludomir Stefańczyk; Łukasz Olewnik; Agata Majos; Michał Polguj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review.

Authors:  Eugénia Cunha; Douglas H Ubelaker
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2019-12-23

8.  Ancestry Studies in Forensic Anthropology: Back on the Frontier of Racism.

Authors:  Ann H Ross; Shanna E Williams
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.