Literature DB >> 17387383

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging small (up to 15 mm) breast carcinomas. Results from a European multi-institutional study.

Gábor Cserni1, Simonetta Bianchi, Vania Vezzosi, Riccardo Arisio, Rita Bori, Johannes L Peterse, Anna Sapino, Isabella Castellano, Maria Drijkoningen, Janina Kulka, Vincenzo Eusebi, Maria P Foschini, Jean-Pierre Bellocq, Cristi Marin, Sten Thorstenson, Isabel Amendoeira, Angelika Reiner-Concin, Thomas Decker, Manuela Lacerda, Paulo Figueiredo, Gábor Fejes.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the preferred method for the nodal staging of early breast cancer, but controversy exists regarding its universal use and consequences in small tumors. 2929 cases of breast carcinomas not larger than 15 mm and staged with SLN biopsy with or without axillary dissection were collected from the authors' institutions. The pathology of the SLNs included multilevel hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was commonly used for cases negative with HE staining. Variables influencing SLN involvement and non-SLN involvement were studied with logistic regression. Factors that influenced SLN involvement included tumor size, multifocality, grade and age. Small tumors up to 4 mm (including in situ and microinvasive carcinomas) seem to have SLN involvement in less than 10%. Non-SLN metastases were associated with tumor grade, the ratio of involved SLNs and SLN involvement type. Isolated tumor cells were not likely to be associated with further nodal load, whereas micrometastases had some subsets with low risk of non-SLN involvement and subsets with higher proportion of further nodal spread. In situ and microinvasive carcinomas have a very low risk of SLN involvement, therefore, these tumors might not need SLN biopsy for staging, and this may be the approach used for very small invasive carcinomas. If an SLN is involved, isolated tumor cells are rarely if ever associated with non-SLN metastases, and subsets of micrometastatic SLN involvement may be approached similarly. With macrometastases the risk of non-SLN involvement increases, and further axillary treatment should be generally indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17387383     DOI: 10.1007/bf02893435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  62 in total

Review 1.  Part IV. Surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  C Holloway
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Sentinel node biopsy for patients with DCIS: a dangerous and unwarranted direction.

Authors:  M D Lagios; M J Silverstein
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal.

Authors:  Kelly M McMasters; Celia Chao; Sandra L Wong; Robert C G Martin; Michael J Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Simple mastectomy and axillary node sampling (pectoral node biopsy) in the management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A P Forrest; H J Stewart; M M Roberts; R J Steele
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial.

Authors:  M Overgaard; M B Jensen; J Overgaard; P S Hansen; C Rose; M Andersson; C Kamby; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; B B Rasmussen; M Blichert-Toft; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node: implications for completion axillary node dissection.

Authors:  Kristine E Calhoun; Nora M Hansen; Roderick R Turner; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Axillary sentinel lymph nodes can be falsely positive due to iatrogenic displacement and transport of benign epithelial cells in patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ira J Bleiweiss; Chandandeep S Nagi; Shabnam Jaffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial.

Authors:  M Overgaard; P S Hansen; J Overgaard; C Rose; M Andersson; F Bach; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; H T Mouridsen; M B Jensen; K Zedeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Giovanni Mazzarol; Viviana Galimberti; Alberto Luini; Virgilio Sacchini; Giuseppe Trifirò; Oreste Gentilini; Giancarlo Pruneri; Paola Naninato; Fabio Torres; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03

10.  Sentinel lymph node metastasis in microinvasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mattia Intra; Stefano Zurrida; Fausto Maffini; Angelica Sonzogni; Giuseppe Trifirò; Roberto Gennari; Paolo Arnone; Guillermo Bassani; Antonio Opazo; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  6 in total

1.  Axillary Lymph Node Status in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Micrometastases (0.2-2 mm).

Authors:  Johannes Bargehr; Michael Edlinger; Michael Hubalek; Christian Marth; Roland Reitsamer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The value of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in surgical management of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Calogero Cipolla; Daniela Cabibi; Salvatore Fricano; Salvatore Vieni; Irene Gentile; Mario Adelfio Latteri
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population?

Authors:  Oldrich Coufal; Tomás Pavlík; Pavel Fabian; Rita Bori; Gábor Boross; István Sejben; Róbert Maráz; Jaroslav Koca; Eva Krejcí; Iva Horáková; Vendula Foltinová; Pavlína Vrtelová; Vojtech Chrenko; Wolde Eliza Tekle; Mária Rajtár; Mihály Svébis; Vuk Fait; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Non-sentinel lymph node metastases associated with isolated breast cancer cells in the sentinel node.

Authors:  Carolien H M van Deurzen; Maaike de Boer; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Peter Bult; Elsken van der Wall; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Prediction of macrometastasis in axillary lymph nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer and the utility of the SUV lymph node/tumor ratio using FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Manabu Futamura; Takahiko Asano; Kazuhiro Kobayashi; Kasumi Morimitsu; Masahito Nawa; Masako Kanematsu; Akemi Morikawa; Ryutaro Mori; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Holbrook E Kohrt; Richard A Olshen; Honnie R Bermas; William H Goodson; Douglas J Wood; Solomon Henry; Robert V Rouse; Lisa Bailey; Vicki J Philben; Frederick M Dirbas; Jocelyn J Dunn; Denise L Johnson; Irene L Wapnir; Robert W Carlson; Frank E Stockdale; Nora M Hansen; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.