Literature DB >> 1738716

Prophylactic cerclage: a method of preventing femur fracture in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

P J Herzwurm1, J Walsh, K A Pettine, F R Ebert.   

Abstract

The incidence of femur fracture in non-cemented hip arthroplasty has been reported to be between 4.1% and 27.8%. To quantitate the hoop stress generated during insertion of a femoral broach in total hip arthroplasty and determine the effect of cerclage with both braided cable and wire, we harvested 14 pairs of embalmed cadaver femurs. These were reamed and broached to duplicate the surgical technique of inserting a straight non-cemented femoral component. Group one consisted of eight matched cadaver femurs which were tested using a single 2.0 mm chrome-cobalt cable placed around the calcar of one femur, with the other serving as a control. Group two consisted of five matched cadaver femurs which were tested using a single 18 gauge cerclage wire in the same manner. In group one, the femurs serving as controls were found to have a mean microstrain of (1425.00 +/- 1180.19). The eight femurs tested with a 2 mm cable were determined to have a mean microstrain of (4179 +/- 2853.89). In group two, the femurs serving as controls were found to have a mean microstrain of (962.60 +/- 956.78). The five femurs in group two tested with a cerclage wire were determined to have a mean microstrain of (1112.00 +/- 975.66). Using a paired t-test, statistical significance was achieved with a confidence level of P less than or equal to .01 in group one. Prophylactic wiring of the proximal femur with 2 mm cable increases the hoop stress resistance and, therefore, should decrease the incidence of intraoperative femur fractures in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738716     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19920201-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  7 in total

1.  Measuring stability of wire cerclage in femoral fractures when performing total hip replacement. In vitro study on a standardized bone model.

Authors:  M Wagner; F Knorr-Held; D Hohmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Total hip arthroplasty for the management of hip fracture: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Jacob B Stirton; Jacob C Maier; Sumon Nandi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-26

3.  Intraoperative femur fracture is associated with stem and instrument design in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Intraoperative femoral fractures: Prevention is better than cure.

Authors:  P S Young; S Patil; R M D Meek
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy with Intermediate Resection Arthroplasty Is Safe for Use in Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection.

Authors:  Sebastian Hardt; Vincent Justus Leopold; Thilo Khakzad; Matthias Pumberger; Carsten Perka; Christian Hipfl
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Intraoperative Fractures during Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Saurabh Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Vikrant Manhas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

7.  Femur Strength is Similar Before and After Iatrogenic Fracture During Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Bailey J Ross; Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; John M Weldy; Charles S Dranoff; Matthew J Weintraub; Nathan E Kim; Hao Wang; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.