Literature DB >> 12198052

Bispectral index in patients with target-controlled or manually-controlled infusion of propofol.

Andreas Lehmann1, Joachim Boldt, Elfi Thaler, Swen Piper, Udo Weisse.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized study we compared bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, time to extubation, and the costs of target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manually-controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol. Forty patients undergoing first-time implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator were included. Anesthesia was performed with remifentanil (0.2-0.3 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1)) and propofol. Propofol was used as TCI (plasma target concentration, 2.5-3.5 micro g/mL; n = 20) or MCI (3.0-4.0 mg. kg(-1). h(-1); n = 20). BIS, heart rate, and arterial blood pressure were measured at six data points: T1, before anesthesia; T2, after intubation; T3, after skin incision; T4, after first defibrillation; T5, after third defibrillation; and T6, after extubation. There were no significant hemodynamic differences between the two groups. BIS was significantly lower at T3 and T4 in the TCI group than in the MCI group. The mean dose of propofol was larger in TCI patients (5.8 +/- 1.4 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) than in the MCI patients (3.7 +/- 0.6 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) (P < 0.05), whereas doses of remifentanil did not differ. Time to extubation did not differ between the two groups (TCI, 13.7 +/- 5.3 min; MCI, 12.3 +/- 3.5 min). One patient in the MCI group had signs of intraoperative awareness without explicit memory after first defibrillation (BIS before shock, 49; after shock, 83). Costs were significantly less in the MCI group (34.83 US dollars) than in the TCI group (39.73 US dollars). BIS failed to predict the adequacy of anesthesia for the next painful stimulus. IMPLICATIONS: In this prospective, randomized study, bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, time to extubation, and costs of target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manually-controlled infusion of propofol were compared. TCI increased the amount of propofol used. BIS failed to predict the adequacy of anesthesia for the next painful stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12198052     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bispectral Index Versus Standard Monitoring in Sedation for Endoscopic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Se Woo Park; Hyuk Lee; Hongyup Ahn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Monitoring depth of anesthesia using combination of EEG measure and hemodynamic variables.

Authors:  R Shalbaf; H Behnam; H Jelveh Moghadam
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 3.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Potential inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by propofol in human primary hepatocytes.

Authors:  Li-Qun Yang; Wei-Feng Yu; Yun-Fei Cao; Bin Gong; Qing Chang; Guang-Shun Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  [Propofol administration systems. Handling, hemodynamics and propofol consumption].

Authors:  J G Triem; K D Röhm; J Boldt; S N Piper
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.

Authors:  Anthony G Messina; Michael Wang; Marshall J Ward; Chase C Wilker; Brett B Smith; Daniel P Vezina; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.