Literature DB >> 17385180

Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005.

P J E Holt1, J D Poloniecki, I M Loftus, J A Michaels, M M Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the relationship between hospital volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in the UK.
METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (2000-2005) were classified as elective, urgent or ruptured AAA repair. Analysis was by modelling of mortality rate, complication rate and length of hospital stay with regard to the annual operative volume, after risk adjustment.
RESULTS: There were 112,545 diagnoses, or repairs, of AAAs, of which 26,822 were infrarenal aneurysms. The mean mortality rate was 7.4, 23.6 and 41.8 per cent for elective, urgent and ruptured AAA repair respectively. Elective AAA repair undertaken at high-volume hospitals showed volume-related improvements in mortality (P < 0.001). Patients were discharged from hospital earlier (P < 0.001). The critical volume threshold was 32 elective AAA repairs per year. For urgent repair, patients at high-volume hospitals had a reduced mortality rate (P = 0.017) with an increased length of stay (P = 0.041). There was no relationship between volume and outcome for ruptured AAA repairs.
CONCLUSION: Increased annual volumes were associated with significant reductions in mortality for elective and urgent AAA repair, but not for repair of ruptured AAAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17385180     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  22 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Ian M Nordon; Robert J Hinchliffe; Ian M Loftus; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Vascular surgery by numbers.

Authors:  Jonothan J Earnshaw; George Hamilton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Data sources and performance measurement.

Authors:  Stephen Singleton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-13

4.  Disparity in the risk stratification of major surgery.

Authors:  D Birchley; J Carlisle; R Telford; J Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  How to improve surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J E Holt; Jan D Poloniecki; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-21

6.  Should we screen for aortic aneurysm? No.

Authors:  James N Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-19

7.  Vascular disease: is AAA screening worth the cost?

Authors:  Frank A Lederle
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides a predictive tool for early and late outcomes in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients.

Authors:  A R Thompson; N Peters; R E Lovegrove; S Ledwidge; A Kitching; T R Magee; R B Galland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  NHS hospital readiness to embrace the proposed NICE guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm: a public perspective.

Authors:  A Misro; D Kanagalingam; S Theivacumar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Scope to improve: a multi-centre audit of 16 064 colonoscopies looking at caecal intubation rates, over a 2-year period.

Authors:  Ajay Mark Verma; Nadine McGrath; Paula Bennett; John de Caestecker; Andrew Dixon; Jayne Eaden; Peter Wurm; Andrew Chilton
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.