Literature DB >> 17383983

Pre-endoscopy serological testing for coeliac disease: evaluation of a clinical decision tool.

Andrew D Hopper1, Simon S Cross, David P Hurlstone, Mark E McAlindon, Alan J Lobo, Marios Hadjivassiliou, Marion E Sloan, Simon Dixon, David S Sanders.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine an effective diagnostic method of detecting all cases of coeliac disease in patients referred for gastroscopy without performing routine duodenal biopsy.
DESIGN: An initial retrospective cohort of patients attending for gastroscopy was analysed to derive a clinical decision tool that could increase the detection of coeliac disease without performing routine duodenal biopsy. The tool incorporated serology (measuring antibodies to tissue transglutaminase) and stratifying patients according to their referral symptoms (patients were classified as having a "high risk" or "low risk" of coeliac disease). The decision tool was then tested on a second cohort of patients attending for gastroscopy. In the second cohort all patients had a routine duodenal biopsy and serology performed.
SETTING: Teaching hospital in Sheffield. PARTICIPANTS: 2000 consecutive adult patients referred for gastroscopy recruited prospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Evaluation of a clinical decision tool using patients' referral symptoms, tissue transglutaminase antibody results, and duodenal biopsy results.
RESULTS: No cases of coeliac disease were missed by the pre-endoscopy testing algorithm. The prevalence of coeliac disease in patients attending for endoscopy was 3.9% (77/2000, 95% confidence interval 3.1% to 4.8%). The prevalence in the high risk and low risk groups was 9.6% (71/739, 7.7% to 12.0%) and 0.5% (6/1261, 0.2% to 1.0%). The prevalence of coeliac disease in patients who were negative for tissue transglutaminase antibody was 0.4% (7/2000). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for a positive antibody result to diagnose coeliac disease was 90.9%, 90.9%, 28.6%, and 99.6%, respectively. Evaluation of the clinical decision tool gave a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 60.8%, 9.3%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-endoscopy serological testing in combination with biopsy of high risk cases detected all cases of coeliac disease. The use of this decision tool may enable the endoscopist to target patients who need a duodenal biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17383983      PMCID: PMC1847864          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39133.668681.BE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  48 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  A F Goddard; A S McIntyre; B B Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28-30, 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  What are the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease? Do sensitivity and specificity vary in different populations?

Authors:  Ivor D Hill
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Association of adult celiac disease with surgical abdominal pain: a case-control study in patients referred to secondary care.

Authors:  David S Sanders; Andrew D Hopper; Iman A F Azmy; Nahida Rahman; David P Hurlstone; John S Leeds; Rina R George; Neeraj Bhala
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Prevalence of celiac disease and its endoscopic markers among patients having routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  W Dickey; D Hughes
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Changing face of adult coeliac disease: experience of a single university hospital in South Yorkshire.

Authors:  D S Sanders; D P Hurlstone; R O Stokes; F Rashid; A Milford-Ward; M Hadjivassiliou; A J Lobo
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Characteristics of adult celiac disease in the USA: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S N Stavropoulos; S G Panagi; S L Goldstein; D J Mcmahon; H Absan; A I Neugut
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Association of adult coeliac disease with irritable bowel syndrome: a case-control study in patients fulfilling ROME II criteria referred to secondary care.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; D P Hurlstone; A Pearce; A M Ward; M E McAlindon; A J Lobo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease: an evolving spectrum.

Authors:  A Fasano; C Catassi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Antiendomysial and antihuman recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-proven European multicentre study.

Authors:  Pekka Collin; Katri Kaukinen; Harald Vogelsang; Ilma Korponay-Szabó; Rudolf Sommer; Elisabeth Schreier; Umberto Volta; Alessandro Granito; Lorenza Veronesi; Françoise Mascart; Annick Ocmant; Anneli Ivarsson; Carina Lagerqvist; Annemarie Bürgin-Wolff; Faruk Hadziselimovic; Raoul I Furlano; Marc A Sidler; Chris J J Mulder; Marije S Goerres; M Luisa Mearin; Maarten K Ninaber; Eivind Gudmand-Høyer; Elisabetta Fabiani; Carlo Catassi; Helena Tidlund; Lisbeth Alainentalo; Markku Mäki
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.566

View more
  52 in total

1.  Response to Marco-Marques et al.

Authors:  Marisa Spencer; Peter Green
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Commentary: Reaching a milestone in diagnosing coeliac disease.

Authors:  Mark L Graber; Atul Kumar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-23

Review 3.  Advances in diagnosis and management of celiac disease.

Authors:  Ciarán P Kelly; Julio C Bai; Edwin Liu; Daniel A Leffler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Carpopedal spasm in an elderly man: an unusual presentation of coeliac disease.

Authors:  Katrin Schmidt; Manish Powari; Tarek Shirazi; Bijay Vaidya
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Coeliac disease: Decision tool needs to be developed for children.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Anneli Ivarsson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-04-28

6.  Coeliac disease in primary care.

Authors:  Roger Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-04-07

Review 7.  Adult coeliac disease.

Authors:  Andrew D Hopper; Marios Hadjivassiliou; Sohail Butt; David S Sanders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-15

8.  [Diagnostic studies].

Authors:  Rosemarie Felder-Puig; Philipp Mad; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

9.  Do endoscopic markers still play a role in diagnosis of celiac disease?

Authors:  A S Puri; P Tyagi; Mohammad Hassan Emami; Somayeh Karimi; Amin Nemati
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

Review 10.  Testing for gluten-related disorders in clinical practice: the role of serology in managing the spectrum of gluten sensitivity.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Andrew C Don-Wauchope; Elena F Verdu
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.