Literature DB >> 19652944

[Diagnostic studies].

Rosemarie Felder-Puig1, Philipp Mad, Gerald Gartlehner.   

Abstract

Despite the large availability of diagnostic tests and procedures and their importance to medicine, evidence for their appropriate use is often limited. Unfortunately, the evaluation of tests is difficult and susceptible to several forms of bias. This paper describes the standard methods for characterizing and comparing the accuracy of diagnostic tests and addresses initiatives such as STARD and QUADAS to improve the quality of diagnostic studies. We inform the reader how to critically appraise the study results and when to rely on the results of diagnostic accuracy studies or randomised clinical trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19652944     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-008-0572-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  28 in total

1.  [Critical appraisal of diagnostic studies in nuclear medicine].

Authors:  J Marienhagen; Ch Eilles
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.379

Review 2.  Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Susan Weinstein; Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael L Lieber
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  [Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to evaluate the clinical practice of radiology].

Authors:  S Puig; R Felder-Puig
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2006-07

Review 4.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  [Randomised controlled trials].

Authors:  Philipp Mad; Rosemarie Felder-Puig; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Randomized clinical trials for cancer screening: rationale and design considerations for imaging tests.

Authors:  William C Black
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Original research in pathology: judgment, or evidence-based medicine?

Authors:  James M Crawford
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 9.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W De Vet
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Marie E Weswood; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick N M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.