BACKGROUND: Undernutrition in hospitals is a common problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged convalescence and duration of hospital stay and increased health care costs. During recent years several initiatives have brought hospital undernutrition into focus and guidelines and standards have been published. In 1997, a questionnaire-based survey among Danish hospital doctors and nurses in selected departments concluded that clinical nutrition did not fulfil accepted standards. AIMS: We wished to determine if improvements had occurred in the intervening period. METHOD: Thus, in 2004 a similar questionnaire was sent to 4000 randomly selected Danish hospital doctors and nurses and responses were compared to those from 1997. The questionnaire dealt with attitudes and practice in the areas of nutritional screening, treatment plan, monitoring as well as with knowledge, education, tools and guidelines, organisation and possible barriers to implementation of nutritional screening and therapy. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 38%. We observed a marked improvement especially in screening procedures, calculation of energy intake in at-risk patients and local availability of guidelines. Many departments had appointed staff members with special interest and knowledge in clinical nutrition. CONCLUSION: Although significant positive changes had thus occurred, the main barriers against implementation of good nutrition care continued to be lack of knowledge, interest and responsibility, in combination with difficulties in making a nutrition plan. This will be the focus of future activities.
BACKGROUND: Undernutrition in hospitals is a common problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged convalescence and duration of hospital stay and increased health care costs. During recent years several initiatives have brought hospital undernutrition into focus and guidelines and standards have been published. In 1997, a questionnaire-based survey among Danish hospital doctors and nurses in selected departments concluded that clinical nutrition did not fulfil accepted standards. AIMS: We wished to determine if improvements had occurred in the intervening period. METHOD: Thus, in 2004 a similar questionnaire was sent to 4000 randomly selected Danish hospital doctors and nurses and responses were compared to those from 1997. The questionnaire dealt with attitudes and practice in the areas of nutritional screening, treatment plan, monitoring as well as with knowledge, education, tools and guidelines, organisation and possible barriers to implementation of nutritional screening and therapy. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 38%. We observed a marked improvement especially in screening procedures, calculation of energy intake in at-risk patients and local availability of guidelines. Many departments had appointed staff members with special interest and knowledge in clinical nutrition. CONCLUSION: Although significant positive changes had thus occurred, the main barriers against implementation of good nutrition care continued to be lack of knowledge, interest and responsibility, in combination with difficulties in making a nutrition plan. This will be the focus of future activities.
Authors: A Duclos; S Touzet; L Restier; P Occelli; F Cour-Andlauer; A Denis; S Polazzi; C Colin; A Lachaux; N Peretti Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Bruno F Sunguya; Krishna C Poudel; Linda B Mlunde; David P Urassa; Junko Yasuoka; Masamine Jimba Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2013-09-24