Literature DB >> 17383349

Long-term follow-up after pacemaker implantation in neonates and infants.

Natalie C Aellig1, Christian Balmer, Ali Dodge-Khatami, Mariette Rahn, René Prêtre, Urs Bauersfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pacemaker (PM) system implantation in neonates and infants is often complicated by hemodynamic instability, small vessel size, and abnormal cardiovascular anatomy. Thus, an open surgical approach for epicardial lead insertion is often required. We assessed the long-term outcomes after epicardial PM implantation in this age group.
METHODS: Between 1992 and 2004, 22 consecutive patients underwent PM implantation within the first year of life. Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads (Medtronic CapSure Epi 10366 and 4968) were inserted through median sternotomy, the sybxyphoid approach, or thoracotomy, and connected to various pulse generators.
RESULTS: Pacemakers were implanted at a median age of 35 days (range, 1 to 300). Intracardiac anatomy was abnormal in 17 patients. Indications for PM therapy were heart block in 18 patients and sinus node dysfunction in 4 patients. During a median follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 4 days to 12.8 years), 7 devices were replaced owing to end of battery life (n = 6) or elective device repositioning (n = 1), at a median of 4.1 years (range, 1 to 7.8). One dislodged ventricular lead and 2 atrial lead sensing failures were observed. Sensing, pacing thresholds, and lead impedances showed good implant and stable follow-up values.
CONCLUSIONS: Pacemaker-associated morbidity is low. Pacemaker system complications with epicardial leads are rare. Battery life is relatively shorter compared with children and adults because of the fast heart rate and complete PM dependency in most of these children. Even for neonates and infants, modern pacemaker therapy is feasible, safe, and effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17383349     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Rescue of an epicardial left ventricular pacing lead without explantation in a patient with CRT-D pocket infection: mission possible.

Authors:  C G Wollmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-06

2.  Discovery and management of diaphragmatic hernia related to abandoned epicardial pacemaker wires in a pregnant woman with {S,L,L} transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Craig C Benson; Anne M Valente; Katherine E Economy; Yael Hoffman-Sage; Laura M Bevilacqua; Mihaela Podovei; Alexander R Opotowsky
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Permanent epicardial pacing in neonates and infants less than 1 year old: 12-year experience at a single center.

Authors:  Junfei Zhao; Ying Huang; Liming Lei; Zeyang Yao; Tian Liu; Hailong Qiu; Canhui Lin; Xiaobing Liu; Yun Teng; Xiaohua Li; Yong Zhang; Jian Zhuang; Jimei Chen; Shusheng Wen
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Cardiac strangulation from epicardial pacemaker leads: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-11

6.  Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block.

Authors:  Roberto Costa; Katia Regina da Silva; Martino Martinelli Filho; Roger Carrillo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.