Literature DB >> 17383322

Defining the optimal treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and decision analysis.

Andrew J Graham1, Fiona M Shrive, William A Ghali, Braden J Manns, Sean C Grondin, Richard J Finley, Joanne Clifton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to combine systematic review and decision analytic techniques to determine the optimal treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all randomized trials of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer that included one of the following strategies compared with surgery alone: chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy followed by surgery, or surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Using the estimates of relative risk for mortality and overall quality of life we constructed a decision model. The outcome of interest was expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).
RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed for the first year, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of death for treatments compared with surgery were 0.87 (0.75 to 1.02) for chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, 0.94 (0.82 to 1.08) for chemotherapy followed by surgery, and 1.33 (0.93 to 1.93) for surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The QALYs gained for surgery alone, chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy followed by surgery, and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy strategies were 2.07, 2.18, 2.14, and 1.99, respectively. If the reduction in utility for multimodality treatment was increased to 21%, the QALYs gained for surgery alone, chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy followed by surgery, and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were 2.07, 2.03, 1.99, and 1.85, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery appears to be associated with the best survival and the largest expected gain in QALYs. However, the improvement in quality-adjusted life expectancy is modest at 40 days, and surgery alone becomes the preferred strategy if the reduction in utility associated with multimodality treatment is increased to 21%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17383322     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  20 in total

1.  Long-term efficacy of perioperative chemoradiotherapy on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Lv; Xiu Feng Cao; Bin Zhu; Lv Ji; Lei Tao; Dong Dong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Towards an optimal treatment strategy for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Gallego Plazas; Vanesa Pons Sanz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Long-term outcome of a phase II study of docetaxel-based multimodality chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Nicholas W Choong; Ann M Mauer; Daniel C Haraf; Mark K Ferguson; Alan B Sandler; Kenneth A Kesler; Paul A S Fishkin; Rafat H Ansari; James Wade; Stuart A Krauss; David F Sciortino; Mitchell C Posner; Masha Kocherginsky; Philip C Hoffman; Livia Szeto; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Activation of histamine H4 receptor suppresses the proliferation and invasion of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via both metabolism and non-metabolism signaling pathways.

Authors:  Gong-Hao He; Jia-Qi Ding; Xin Zhang; Wen-Mang Xu; Xiao-Qian Lin; Mei-Jin Huang; Ju Feng; Ping Wang; Wen-Ke Cai
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  The frontline of esophageal cancer treatment: questions to be asked and answered.

Authors:  Cheng-Che Tu; Po-Kuei Hsu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

Review 6.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Variations in the Histopathologic Type of Esophageal Carcinoma Between the United States of America and India.

Authors:  Paul Kolkman; Apollo Stack; Molly McCarthy; Marcy Kolkman; T Subramanyeshwar Rao; Srinivasulu Mukta; Shireen Rajaram; Jon Thompson; Chandrakanth Are
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 8.  Esophageal cancer: staging system and guidelines for staging and treatment.

Authors:  Mark F Berry
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Quality-of-life measures as predictors of post-esophagectomy survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Chang; Yun-Fang Tsai; Yin-Kai Chao; Meng-Yu Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Preoperative and early postoperative quality of life predict survival in potentially curable patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mark van Heijl; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Angela G E M de Boer; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Hans B Reitsma; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo W Tilanus; Jan J B van Lanschot; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.