BACKGROUND: Carbamazepine is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with partial onset seizures. Several newer drugs possess efficacy against these seizure types but previous randomised controlled trials have failed to inform a choice between these drugs. We aimed to assess efficacy with regards to longer-term outcomes, quality of life, and health economic outcomes. METHODS: SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm A recruited 1721 patients for whom carbamazepine was deemed to be standard treatment, and they were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 12-months remission, and assessment was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748. FINDINGS: For time to treatment failure, lamotrigine was significantly better than carbamazepine (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78 [95% CI 0.63-0.97]), gabapentin (0.65 [0.52-0.80]), and topiramate (0.64 [0.52-0.79]), and had a non-significant advantage compared with oxcarbazepine (1.15 [0.86-1.54]). For time to 12-month remission carbamazepine was significantly better than gabapentin (0.75 [0.63-0.90]), and estimates suggest a non-significant advantage for carbamazepine against lamotrigine (0.91 [0.77-1.09]), topiramate (0.86 [0.72-1.03]), and oxcarbazepine (0.92 [0.73-1.18]). In a per-protocol analysis, at 2 and 4 years the difference (95% CI) in the proportion achieving a 12-month remission (lamotrigine-carbamazepine) is 0 (-8 to 7) and 5 (-3 to 12), suggesting non-inferiority of lamotrigine compared with carbamazepine. INTERPRETATION: Lamotrigine is clinically better than carbamazepine, the standard drug treatment, for time to treatment failure outcomes and is therefore a cost-effective alternative for patients diagnosed with partial onset seizures.
BACKGROUND: Carbamazepine is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with partial onset seizures. Several newer drugs possess efficacy against these seizure types but previous randomised controlled trials have failed to inform a choice between these drugs. We aimed to assess efficacy with regards to longer-term outcomes, quality of life, and health economic outcomes. METHODS: SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm A recruited 1721 patients for whom carbamazepine was deemed to be standard treatment, and they were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 12-months remission, and assessment was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748. FINDINGS: For time to treatment failure, lamotrigine was significantly better than carbamazepine (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78 [95% CI 0.63-0.97]), gabapentin (0.65 [0.52-0.80]), and topiramate (0.64 [0.52-0.79]), and had a non-significant advantage compared with oxcarbazepine (1.15 [0.86-1.54]). For time to 12-month remission carbamazepine was significantly better than gabapentin (0.75 [0.63-0.90]), and estimates suggest a non-significant advantage for carbamazepine against lamotrigine (0.91 [0.77-1.09]), topiramate (0.86 [0.72-1.03]), and oxcarbazepine (0.92 [0.73-1.18]). In a per-protocol analysis, at 2 and 4 years the difference (95% CI) in the proportion achieving a 12-month remission (lamotrigine-carbamazepine) is 0 (-8 to 7) and 5 (-3 to 12), suggesting non-inferiority of lamotrigine compared with carbamazepine. INTERPRETATION: Lamotrigine is clinically better than carbamazepine, the standard drug treatment, for time to treatment failure outcomes and is therefore a cost-effective alternative for patients diagnosed with partial onset seizures.
Authors: M M Guerreiro; U Vigonius; H Pohlmann; M L de Manreza; N Fejerman; S A Antoniuk; A Moore Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Martin J. Brodie; Stephen J. Wroe; Andrew D. P. Dean; Thomas A. H. Holdich; John Whitehead; John W. Stevens Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: J A French; A M Kanner; J Bautista; B Abou-Khalil; T Browne; C L Harden; W H Theodore; C Bazil; J Stern; S C Schachter; D Bergen; D Hirtz; G D Montouris; M Nespeca; B Gidal; W J Marks; W R Turk; J H Fischer; B Bourgeois; A Wilner; R E Faught; R C Sachdeo; A Beydoun; T A Glauser Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Martin J Brodie; David W Chadwick; Henning Anhut; Andreas Otte; Silke-Lo Messmer; Stephen Maton; Wilhelm Sauermann; Guta Murray; Elizabeth A Garofalo Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Mark McCormack; Ana Alfirevic; Stephane Bourgeois; John J Farrell; Dalia Kasperavičiūtė; Mary Carrington; Graeme J Sills; Tony Marson; Xiaoming Jia; Paul I W de Bakker; Krishna Chinthapalli; Mariam Molokhia; Michael R Johnson; Gerard D O'Connor; Elijah Chaila; Saud Alhusaini; Kevin V Shianna; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; Nicole Walley; Massimo Pandolfo; Werner Pichler; B Kevin Park; Chantal Depondt; Sanjay M Sisodiya; David B Goldstein; Panos Deloukas; Norman Delanty; Gianpiero L Cavalleri; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 91.245