BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing. Despite recommendations for HCC screening from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, the National Cancer Institute does not recommend screening. The question of whether screening is of benefit is an important one. The purpose of this study was to examine the determinants of screening, as well as the impact of screening on disease stage, treatment received, and survival in a US veteran population. METHODS: Patients with hepatitis C and HCC who receive care in the South Texas Veteran Health Care System were identified using the Veterans Affairs national hepatitis C registry. Screening status was determined by chart review. Potential determinants of screening were assessed. Screened and unscreened patients were compared on the basis of disease stage at diagnosis, treatment received, and survival. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were identified and included in the analysis, of whom only 16 (22%) were screened. Patients seen by a hepatologist before diagnosis were more likely to be screened. All screened patients were diagnosed with early stage disease, compared with 22% of unscreened patients (P < .001). Screened patients were 10 times more likely to have received potentially curative treatment (95% confidence interval, 2.91-31.35). Log-rank test of equality of survivor functions was statistically significant for differences between screened and unscreened groups (P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease screening recommendations, and suggest that screening is underused.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing. Despite recommendations for HCC screening from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, the National Cancer Institute does not recommend screening. The question of whether screening is of benefit is an important one. The purpose of this study was to examine the determinants of screening, as well as the impact of screening on disease stage, treatment received, and survival in a US veteran population. METHODS:Patients with hepatitis C and HCC who receive care in the South Texas Veteran Health Care System were identified using the Veterans Affairs national hepatitis C registry. Screening status was determined by chart review. Potential determinants of screening were assessed. Screened and unscreened patients were compared on the basis of disease stage at diagnosis, treatment received, and survival. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were identified and included in the analysis, of whom only 16 (22%) were screened. Patients seen by a hepatologist before diagnosis were more likely to be screened. All screened patients were diagnosed with early stage disease, compared with 22% of unscreened patients (P < .001). Screened patients were 10 times more likely to have received potentially curative treatment (95% confidence interval, 2.91-31.35). Log-rank test of equality of survivor functions was statistically significant for differences between screened and unscreened groups (P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease screening recommendations, and suggest that screening is underused.
Authors: Andrew M Moon; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Feng Su; Samuel B Ho; Ga-Young Jin; Elliott Lowy; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Amit G Singal; Adam Yopp; Celette S Skinner; Milton Packer; William M Lee; Jasmin A Tiro Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Winston E Abara; P Spradling; Y Zhong; A Moorman; E H Teshale; L Rupp; S C Gordon; M Schmidt; J A Boscarino; Y G Daida; S D Holmberg Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2020-06
Authors: Sahil Mittal; Fasiha Kanwal; Jun Ying; Randy Chung; Yvonne H Sada; Sarah Temple; Jessica A Davila; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Robert O Morgan; Peter A Richardson; Xianglin L Du; Katherine A McGlynn; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Vilas Patwardhan; Sonali Paul; Kathleen E Corey; Sameer M Mazhar; James M Richter; Michael Thiim; Raymond T Chung Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 3.199