Winston E Abara1, P Spradling2, Y Zhong2, A Moorman2, E H Teshale2, L Rupp3, S C Gordon3, M Schmidt4, J A Boscarino5, Y G Daida6, S D Holmberg2. 1. Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop G-37, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. wabara@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop G-37, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. 3. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. 4. Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA. 6. Kaiser Permanente, Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Six-monthly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in cirrhotic patients has been recommended since 2011. HCC prognosis is associated with diagnosis at an early stage. We examined the prevalence and correlates of 6-monthly HCC surveillance in a cohort of HCV-infected cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Data were obtained from the medical records of patients receiving care from four hospitals between January 2011 and December 2016. Frequencies and logistic regression were conducted. RESULTS: Of 2,933 HCV-infected cirrhotic patients, most were ≥ 60 years old (68.5%), male (62.2%), White (65.8%), and had compensated cirrhosis (74.2%). The median follow-up period was 3.5 years. Among these patients, 10.9% were consistently screened 6 monthly and 21.4% were never screened. Patients with a longer history of cirrhosis (AOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80-0.93) were less likely to be screened 6 monthly while decompensated cirrhotic patients (AOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.06-1.81) and cirrhotic patients between 18 and 44 years (AOR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.07-3.74) were more likely to be screened 6 monthly compared to compensated cirrhotic patients and patients 60 years and older respectively. There were no significant differences by race, gender, or insurance type. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of consistent HCC surveillance remains low despite formalized recommendations. One in five patients was never surveilled. Patients with a longer history of cirrhosis were less likely to be surveilled consistently despite their greater HCC risk. Improving providers' knowledge about current HCC surveillance guidelines, educating patients about the benefits of consistent HCC surveillance, and systemic interventions like clinical reminders and standing HCC surveillance protocols can improve guideline-concordant surveillance in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Six-monthly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in cirrhotic patients has been recommended since 2011. HCC prognosis is associated with diagnosis at an early stage. We examined the prevalence and correlates of 6-monthly HCC surveillance in a cohort of HCV-infected cirrhoticpatients. METHODS: Data were obtained from the medical records of patients receiving care from four hospitals between January 2011 and December 2016. Frequencies and logistic regression were conducted. RESULTS: Of 2,933 HCV-infected cirrhoticpatients, most were ≥ 60 years old (68.5%), male (62.2%), White (65.8%), and had compensated cirrhosis (74.2%). The median follow-up period was 3.5 years. Among these patients, 10.9% were consistently screened 6 monthly and 21.4% were never screened. Patients with a longer history of cirrhosis (AOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80-0.93) were less likely to be screened 6 monthly while decompensated cirrhotic patients (AOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.06-1.81) and cirrhotic patients between 18 and 44 years (AOR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.07-3.74) were more likely to be screened 6 monthly compared to compensated cirrhotic patients and patients 60 years and older respectively. There were no significant differences by race, gender, or insurance type. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of consistent HCC surveillance remains low despite formalized recommendations. One in five patients was never surveilled. Patients with a longer history of cirrhosis were less likely to be surveilled consistently despite their greater HCC risk. Improving providers' knowledge about current HCC surveillance guidelines, educating patients about the benefits of consistent HCC surveillance, and systemic interventions like clinical reminders and standing HCC surveillance protocols can improve guideline-concordant surveillance in clinical practice.
Authors: Suzanne van Meer; Robert A de Man; Minneke J Coenraad; Dave Sprengers; Karin M J van Nieuwkerk; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Peter L M Jansen; Jan N M IJzermans; Martijn G H van Oijen; Peter D Siersema; Karel J van Erpecum Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Vilas Patwardhan; Sonali Paul; Kathleen E Corey; Sameer M Mazhar; James M Richter; Michael Thiim; Raymond T Chung Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: David S Goldberg; Adriana Valderrama; Rajesh Kamalakar; Sujit S Sansgiry; Svetlana Babajanyan; James D Lewis Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Sherean Farvardin; Jaimin Patel; Maleka Khambaty; Olutola A Yerokun; Huram Mok; Jasmin A Tiro; Adam C Yopp; Neehar D Parikh; Jorge A Marrero; Amit G Singal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Stuart C Gordon; Lois E Lamerato; Loralee B Rupp; Scott D Holmberg; Anne C Moorman; Philip R Spradling; Eyasu Teshale; Fujie Xu; Joseph A Boscarino; Vinutha Vijayadeva; Mark A Schmidt; Nancy Oja-Tebbe; Mei Lu Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Vera Yakovchenko; Timothy R Morgan; Edward J Miech; Brittney Neely; Carolyn Lamorte; Sandra Gibson; Lauren A Beste; Heather McCurdy; Dawn Scott; Rachel I Gonzalez; Angela M Park; Byron J Powell; Jasmohan S Bajaj; Jason A Dominitz; Maggie Chartier; David B Ross; Matthew J Chinman; Shari S Rogal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 17.298
Authors: Shari S Rogal; Vera Yakovchenko; Rachel Gonzalez; Angela Park; Lauren A Beste; Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror; Jasmohan S Bajaj; Dawn Scott; Heather McCurdy; Emily Comstock; Michael Sidorovic; Sandra Gibson; Carolyn Lamorte; Anna Nobbe; Maggie Chartier; David Ross; Jason A Dominitz; Timothy R Morgan Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 6.639