Literature DB >> 17382397

LASIK in the presbyopic age group: safety, efficacy, and predictability in 40- to 69-year-old patients.

Ramon C Ghanem1, Jose de la Cruz, Faisal M Tobaigy, Leonard P K Ang, Dimitri T Azar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the safety, efficacy, and predictability of LASIK in a presbyopic population and to examine possible differences between age groups.
DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive, comparative consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred ten eyes of 424 patients between 40 and 69 years of age who underwent LASIK by the same surgeon between January 1999 and September 2005. Patients had manifest refractive spherical errors ranging from -10.5 to +6 diopters (D) and cylinder of up to 2.50 D.
METHODS: LASIK was performed with IntraLase femtosecond laser or Hansatome microkeratomes and VISX Star (S4 or S2; VISX Inc., Santa Clara, CA) or Baush & Lomb Technolas 217z (Zyoptix or PlanoScan; Bausch & Lomb, Claremont, CA) excimer lasers. There were 511 myopic eyes (spherical equivalent [SE], -5.03+/-2.02 D) and 199 hyperopic eyes (SE, +2.21+/-1.21 D). Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (40 to 49 years old; n = 359 eyes), group 2 (50 to 59 years old; n = 293 eyes), and group 3 (60 to 69 years old; n = 58 eyes). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), retreatment rates, safety, efficacy, and predictability.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 45, 53, and 63 years, respectively. With increasing age, there was a trend toward higher retreatment rates and more myopic end points. Safety, efficacy, and predictability were comparable between all groups. At the final follow-up (mean+/-standard deviation, 10.4+/-7.4 months), 80% to 100% of eyes had 20/30 or better UCVA and 81% to 90% were within +/-1.00 D. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA, and only 9 eyes (1.3%) lost 2 lines. Subgroup analysis of eyes with a follow-up of 12 months or more was performed. The results were compared with those with shorter follow-up. Both subgroups had comparable outcomes; the duration of follow-up did not affect the visual outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a trend toward worse final BSCVA and higher retreatment rates in older patients, a greater risk of visual loss after LASIK was not observed. LASIK for myopia and hyperopia has reasonable safety, efficacy, and predictability profiles in the 40- to 69-year-old presbyopic population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17382397     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy and refractive outcomes of LASIK surgery in patients aged 65 or older.

Authors:  Paloma López-Montemayor; Jorge E Valdez-García; Denise Loya-García; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Interaction between otolith organ and semicircular canal vestibulo-ocular reflexes during eccentric rotation in humans.

Authors:  Claire C Gianna-Poulin; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The association between femtosecond laser flap parameters and ocular aberrations after uncomplicated custom myopic LASIK.

Authors:  Christopher T Hood; Ronald R Krueger; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Surgical management of presbyopia.

Authors:  André Am Torricelli; Jackson B Junior; Marcony R Santhiago; Samir J Bechara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-06

5.  Outcomes of excimer laser enhancements in pseudophakic patients with multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Steven C Schallhorn; Jan A Venter; David Teenan; Julie M Schallhorn; Keith A Hettinger; Stephen J Hannan; Martina Pelouskova
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-27

Review 6.  Corneal Refractive Procedures for the Treatment of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Kareem Moussa; Naz Jehangir; Tova Mannis; Wai L Wong; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-04-27

7.  Comparison of a hydrogel corneal inlay and monovision laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients: focus on visual performance and optical quality.

Authors:  Cornelis Verdoorn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-20

8.  Patient satisfaction and self-reported dry eye symptoms in hyperopic patients treated with femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Petri Mäkinen; Anne Huhtala; Juhani Pietilä; Janika Nättinen; Teppo Rajala; Kalle Salmenhaara; Magomed Udratov; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-26

9.  Near visual acuity following hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy in a presbyopic age group.

Authors:  Michael Moore; Antonio Leccisotti; Claire Grills; Tara C B Moore
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-20

Review 10.  Current management of presbyopia.

Authors:  Pandelis A Papadopoulos; Alexandros P Papadopoulos
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.