Literature DB >> 17382214

The American College of Surgeons' closed claims study: new insights for improving care.

F Dean Griffen1, Linda S Stephens, James B Alexander, H Randolph Bailey, Scott E Maizel, Beth Howell Sutton, Karen L Posner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All physicians must be vigilant in the pursuit of safe care for patients. While problems in care are identified, education that provides an understanding of these problems and guidelines for improvement can enhance patient safety. Our objective was to determine problematic aspects of surgical care, including care provided by surgeons before, during, after, and instead of surgery, that negatively affect patient safety. STUDY
DESIGN: Four hundred sixty malpractice claims against general surgeons were reviewed by surgeons (FACS). All claims were closed in 2003 or 2004. The data collection was completed at five medical liability companies representing a nationwide distribution of surgeons. Surgeons also dictated or wrote narratives for each case. The quantitative data and narratives were later analyzed to determine events responsible for unsafe care.
RESULTS: Surgeon-reviewers identified deficiencies in care that fell below accepted standards more often before and after operations than during them. These deficiencies were often the result of a failure to recognize surgical injuries, and many of these deficiencies were preventable. The quality of surgical care was satisfactorily met in 36% of cases. The most common procedures involving patient safety concerns were those involving the biliary tract, intestines, hernias, vascular system, esophagus, and stomach. The most frequent events leading to claims included delayed diagnosis, failure to diagnose, failure to order diagnostic tests, technical misadventure, delayed treatment, and failure to treat. Complications occurring most frequently were organ injuries, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Closed claims reviews provide valuable data that may enhance provider performance through heightened awareness of common unsafe practices. Specifically, opportunities exist to improve surgical care provided during the preoperative and postoperative phases of treatment through continuing medical education to improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17382214     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  20 in total

1.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality and safety initiatives in the future practice of surgery: meeting patient demands for enhanced professionalism.

Authors:  Thomas R Russell
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  What Adverse Events and Injuries Are Cited in Anesthesia Malpractice Claims for Nonspine Orthopaedic Surgery?

Authors:  Christopher D Kent; Linda S Stephens; Karen L Posner; Karen B Domino
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The surgical safety checklist survey: a national perspective on patient safety.

Authors:  E Nugent; H Hseino; K Ryan; O Traynor; P Neary; F B V Keane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Evidence based development of bedside clinical drug rules for surgical patients.

Authors:  Maya A Ramrattan; Eveline B Boeker; Kim Ram; Desiree M T Burgers; Monica de Boer; Loraine Lie-A-Huen; Wilhelmina M C Mulder; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-04-20

6.  Factors that determine satisfaction with surgical treatment of low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Yihang Liu; Rose Maly
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11

Review 7.  Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review.

Authors:  Fernando J Kim; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; Leticia Nogueira; Timothy Harlin; David L Paul
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-06-05

8.  A new journal devoted to patient safety in surgery: the time is now!

Authors:  Philip F Stahel; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser; Wade R Smith
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2007-11-07

9.  Current challenges and future perspectives for patient safety in surgery.

Authors:  Philip F Stahel; Cyril Mauffrey; Nathan Butler
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 10.  Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Treadwell; Scott Lucas; Amy Y Tsou
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.