Literature DB >> 17382144

Comparative study of oncologic outcome of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and standard nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Daisuke Manabe1, Takashi Saika, Shin Ebara, Shinya Uehara, Atsushi Nagai, Ryuji Fujita, Shin Irie, Daisuke Yamada, Tomoyasu Tsushima, Yasutomo Nasu, Hiromi Kumon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the oncologic safety of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU), we compared the long-term oncologic outcome of LNU versus open nephroureterectomy (ONU) in patients with upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.
METHODS: A total of 367 nephroureterectomy procedures were performed at our institutes for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma without distant metastases. Of 224 patients without concomitant or previous bladder cancer, 58 underwent LNU with open intact specimen retrieval plus open distal ureter and bladder cuff removal and 166 underwent ONU. Their data were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 13.6 months (range 14 to 34) for the LNU group and 28.0 months (range 14 to 36) for the ONU group.
RESULTS: Bladder recurrence was recognized in 19 patients (32.8%) after LNU at a median follow-up of 5.6 months compared with 63 patients (38.0%) after ONU. Local recurrence only developed in 2 patients (1.1%) after ONU. One port site metastasis occurred in a patient who had undergone LNU. Distant metastases developed in 10 patients (17.2 %) after LNU and 33 patients (19.9%) after ONU. The frequency of bladder recurrence, local recurrence, and distant metastases did not differ significantly between the two groups. The actual disease-free 2-year survival rates were similar (75.6% versus 81.7%). In all patients, the risk of metastases and death increased with advanced tumor stage and grade, but not by surgical procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, LNU does not negatively affect long-term oncologic control and can be considered an alternative modality. Tumor stage and grade are, however, important prognostic factors in the incidence of metastases and cancer-specific mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17382144     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease-specific survival associated with surgical technique?

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Daher C Chade; Guilherme Godoy; Matthew Kaag; Angel M Cronin; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Canadian guidelines for postoperative surveillance of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard; Peter Black; Wassim Kassouf; Christopher Morash; Ricardo Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Holger Till; Martin Burchardt; Thomas R Herrmann; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Updates in endourology.

Authors:  Victor Palit; Adrian D Joyce
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  The role of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jamie Messer; Yu Kuan Lin; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Emma Mullen; Kamran Ahmed; Ben Challacombe
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

7.  Two-micron thulium laser resection of the distal ureter and bladder cuff during nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Kun Pang; Shi-bo Liu; Hai-bin Wei; Jian Zhuo; Mei-li Li; Shu-jie Xia; Xiao-wen Sun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Regional differences in practice patterns and associated outcomes for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Canada.

Authors:  Michael Metcalfe; Wassim Kassouf; Ricardo Rendon; David Bell; Jonathan Izawa; Joseph Chin; Anil Kapoor; Edward Matsumoto; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; Louis Lacombe; Yves Fradet; Adrian Fairey; Niels-Eric Jacobson; Darryl Drachenberg; Ilias Cagiannos; Alan So; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management of the distal ureter: a review of current techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Davis P Viprakasit; Amanda M Macejko; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.