Literature DB >> 17379473

Stage migration in colorectal cancer related to improved lymph node assessment.

K Derwinger1, G Carlsson, B Gustavsson.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical impact of improved cooperation between the treating surgeons and pathologists in a high volume surgical unit. As a measure we used the staging process with special focus on lymph node assessment.
FINDINGS: Comparing two periods 5 years apart, we found a significant increase in the number of nodes examined and also an increase in the number of metastasis-positive nodes. Concurrently, we observed a trend in stage migration from stage I/II towards stage III, whilst stage IV remained unchanged. This was one factor that contributed to an increase in the number of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. We also found that the number of assessed nodes had an impact on survival in stage II. The major change in practise was the implementation of a multidisciplinary team conference and the associated possibility of reciprocal feedback.
CONCLUSION: Lymph node status has a key role in cancer staging and in the selection of further therapy. The quality and the standard of the assessment can be improved through multidisciplinary cooperation and it has an impact on the clinical decisions and can affect long-term survival. A correct node status should be mandatory in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17379473     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yun-Jau Chang; Yao-Jen Chang; Li-Ju Chen; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Colorectal cancer incidence and survival by sub-site and stage of diagnosis: a population-based study at the advent of national screening.

Authors:  J McDevitt; H Comber; P M Walsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Risk groups defined by Recursive Partitioning Analysis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with colorectal resection.

Authors:  Yun-Jau Chang; Li-Ju Chen; Yao-Jen Chang; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  The prognostic role of tissue TLR2 and TLR4 in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ines Beilmann-Lehtonen; Camilla Böckelman; Harri Mustonen; Selja Koskensalo; Jaana Hagström; Caj Haglund
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Expression of cyclin D1a and D1b as predictive factors for treatment response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M P Myklebust; Z Li; T H Tran; H Rui; E S Knudsen; H Elsaleh; Ø Fluge; B Vonen; H E Myrvold; S Leh; K M Tveit; R G Pestell; O Dahl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Primary tumour immune response and lymph node yields in colon cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil Lal; Dedrick Kok Hong Chan; Minn E Ng; Louis Vermeulen; Simon James Alexander Buczacki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 9.075

7.  Survival Contradiction Between Stage IIA and Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shaobo Mo; Weixing Dai; Wenqiang Xiang; Ben Huang; Yaqi Li; Yang Feng; Qingguo Li; Guoxiang Cai
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.207

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.