Literature DB >> 17378430

Coil-dependent signaling pathway is not required for Mi-1-mediated potato aphid resistance.

Kishor K Bhattarai1, Qi-Guang Xie, Daniel Pourshalimi, Ted Younglove, Isgouhi Kaloshian.   

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) has a unique resistance gene, Mi-1, that confers resistance to animals from distinct taxa, nematodes, and piercing and sucking insects. Mi-1 encodes a protein with a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeat motifs. Early in the potato aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae)--tomato interactions, aphid feeding induces the expression of the jasmonic acid (JA)-regulated proteinase inhibitor genes, Pin1 and Pin2. The jail-1 (jasmonic acid insensitive 1) tomato mutant, which is impaired in JA perception, was used to gain additional insight into the JA signaling pathway and its role in the Mi-1-mediated aphid resistance. The jail-1 mutant has a deletion in the Coil gene that encodes a putative F-box protein. In this study, aphid colonization, survival, and fecundity were compared on wild-type tomato and jail-1 mutant. In choice assays, the jail-1 mutant showed higher colonization by potato aphids compared with wild-type tomato. In contrast, no-choice assays showed no difference in potato aphid survival or fecundity between jail-1 and the wild-type parent. Plants homozygous for Mi-1 and for the jail mutation were not compromised in resistance to potato aphids, using either choice or no-choice assays. In addition, the accumulation of JA-regulated Pin1 transcripts after aphid feeding was Coil dependent. Taken together, these data indicate that, although potato aphids activate Coil-dependent defense response in tomato, this response is not required for Mi-1-mediated resistance to aphids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17378430     DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-20-3-0276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact        ISSN: 0894-0282            Impact factor:   4.171


  18 in total

Review 1.  Role of phytohormones in insect-specific plant reactions.

Authors:  Matthias Erb; Stefan Meldau; Gregg A Howe
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Avoiding effective defenses: strategies employed by phloem-feeding insects.

Authors:  Linda L Walling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  A salivary effector enables whitefly to feed on host plants by eliciting salicylic acid-signaling pathway.

Authors:  Hong-Xing Xu; Li-Xin Qian; Xing-Wei Wang; Ruo-Xuan Shao; Yue Hong; Shu-Sheng Liu; Xiao-Wei Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Foliar aphid feeding recruits rhizosphere bacteria and primes plant immunity against pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in pepper.

Authors:  Boyoung Lee; Soohyun Lee; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  GroEL from the endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola betrays the aphid by triggering plant defense.

Authors:  Ritu Chaudhary; Hagop S Atamian; Zhouxin Shen; Steven P Briggs; Isgouhi Kaloshian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Loss of function of FATTY ACID DESATURASE7 in tomato enhances basal aphid resistance in a salicylate-dependent manner.

Authors:  Carlos A Avila; Lirio M Arévalo-Soliz; Lingling Jia; Duroy A Navarre; Zhaorigetu Chen; Gregg A Howe; Qing-Wei Meng; Jonathon E Smith; Fiona L Goggin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  SlWRKY70 is required for Mi-1-mediated resistance to aphids and nematodes in tomato.

Authors:  Hagop S Atamian; Thomas Eulgem; Isgouhi Kaloshian
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 8.  Genetic and biochemical mechanisms of rice resistance to planthopper.

Authors:  Yang Ling; Zhang Weilin
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.570

9.  Microarray analysis of the interaction between the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi and host plants reveals both differences and similarities between susceptible and partially resistant barley lines.

Authors:  Gabriele Delp; Therese Gradin; Inger Ahman; Lisbeth M V Jonsson
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  Manipulation of plant defense responses by the tomato psyllid (Bactericerca cockerelli) and its associated endosymbiont Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous.

Authors:  Clare L Casteel; Allison K Hansen; Linda L Walling; Timothy D Paine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.