Literature DB >> 17377729

Multinational, freshwater biomonitoring programs in the developing world: lessons learned from African and Southeast Asian river surveys.

Vincent H Resh1.   

Abstract

Biomonitoring programs are widely used in developed countries. They also offer many advantages in assessing ecological consequences of perturbations in developing countries, including reducing the equipment-operation, maintenance, and training costs associated with physicochemical monitoring. Three case histories of river biomonitoring using freshwater organisms (fish, benthic macroinvertebrates, diatoms, zooplankton) are described that involve (1) documentation of environmental effects from long-term, large-scale applications of insecticides to control insect-vectors of river blindness (onchocerciasis) in 11 West African countries; (2) water quality assessments and restoration planning in and around national parks in three East African countries; and (3) evaluation of overall ecological health of the Lower Mekong River in four Southeast Asian countries. As in developed countries, benthic macroinvertebrates are the organisms most widely used in biomonitoring in developing countries. Conflicting opinions of system resilience and whether expected changes are within natural variation may result in differences in underlying hypotheses proposed, study designs implemented, and study execution; each may lead to uncorrectable bias. Direct transfers of approaches used from developed to developing countries are often appropriate; however, techniques dependent on pollution-tolerance values are often region specific and not transferable. Typically expressed concerns about applications of biomonitoring in developing countries include poor coordination among agencies; lack of legislation, identification keys, and trained personnel; and incomplete information on how tropical rivers function. Problems are real but solvable, as evident from accomplishments in several multicountry programs in developing countries. Developed countries requiring coordinated monitoring of international rivers may benefit from examining successful programs under way in developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17377729     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0151-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification.

Authors:  V H Resh; J D Unzicker
Journal:  J Water Pollut Control Fed       Date:  1975-01

Review 2.  Long-term, large-scale biomonitoring of the unknown: assessing the effects of insecticides to control river blindness (onchocerciasis) in West Africa.

Authors:  Vincent H Resh; Christian Lévêque; Bernhard Statzner
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy.

Authors:  Kipling W Will; Brent D Mishler; Quentin D Wheeler
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar.

Authors:  M Alex Smith; Brian L Fisher; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches.

Authors:  Núria Bonada; Narcís Prat; Vincent H Resh; Bernhard Statzner
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Prospects for monitoring freshwater ecosystems towards the 2010 targets.

Authors:  C Revenga; I Campbell; R Abell; P de Villiers; M Bryer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Environmental assessment of larvicide use in the onchocerciasis control programme.

Authors:  D Calamari; L Yameogo; J M Hougard; C Leveque
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  1998-12
  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs.

Authors:  Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Tolerance values of benthic macroinvertebrates for stream biomonitoring: assessment of assumptions underlying scoring systems worldwide.

Authors:  Feng-Hsun Chang; Justin E Lawrence; Blanca Rios-Touma; Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Development and validation of a macroinvertebrate index of biotic integrity (IBI) for assessing urban impacts to Northern California freshwater wetlands.

Authors:  Kevin B Lunde; Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Identifying reference conditions and quantifying biological variability within benthic macroinvertebrate communities in perennial and non-perennial northern California streams.

Authors:  Kevin B Lunde; Matthew R Cover; Raphael D Mazor; Christopher A Sommers; Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Survey of water bugs in bankim, a new buruli ulcer endemic area in cameroon.

Authors:  Solange Meyin A Ebong; Sara Eyangoh; Estelle Marion; Jordi Landier; Laurent Marsollier; Jean-François Guégan; Philippe Legall
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2012-05-16

6.  Evidence of Water Quality Degradation in Lower Mekong Basin Revealed by Self-Organizing Map.

Authors:  Ratha Chea; Gaël Grenouillet; Sovan Lek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.