BACKGROUND: Although pulsed-dye-laser therapy is currently the gold standard for the treatment of port-wine stains, few objective data are available on its long-term efficacy. Using objective color measurements, we performed a 10-year follow-up of a previously conducted prospective clinical study of the treatment of port-wine stains with a pulsed-dye laser. METHODS: We invited the patients to undergo repeated color measurements performed by the same procedures as in the previous study. The results at long-term follow-up were compared with color measurements obtained before treatment and after completion of an average of five laser treatments of the complete port-wine stain. A questionnaire was used to investigate patients' satisfaction with the treatment and their perception of long-term changes in the stain. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients from whom color measurements were obtained in the previous study, 51 were included in this study. The patients had received a median of seven additional treatment sessions since the last color measurement, which had been made after an average of five treatments. The median length of follow-up was 9.5 years. On average, the stain when measured at follow-up was significantly darker than it was when measured after the last of the initial five laser treatments (P=0.001), but it was still significantly lighter than it was when measured before treatment (P<0.001). Fifty-nine percent of patients were satisfied with the overall treatment result. Six percent of patients reported that the stain had become lighter since their last treatment, 59% that it was unchanged, and 35% that it had become darker. CONCLUSIONS: Using objective color measurements, we observed significant redarkening of port-wine stains at long-term follow-up after pulsed-dye-laser therapy. Patients should be informed about the possibility of redarkening before beginning treatment. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
BACKGROUND: Although pulsed-dye-laser therapy is currently the gold standard for the treatment of port-wine stains, few objective data are available on its long-term efficacy. Using objective color measurements, we performed a 10-year follow-up of a previously conducted prospective clinical study of the treatment of port-wine stains with a pulsed-dye laser. METHODS: We invited the patients to undergo repeated color measurements performed by the same procedures as in the previous study. The results at long-term follow-up were compared with color measurements obtained before treatment and after completion of an average of five laser treatments of the complete port-wine stain. A questionnaire was used to investigate patients' satisfaction with the treatment and their perception of long-term changes in the stain. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients from whom color measurements were obtained in the previous study, 51 were included in this study. The patients had received a median of seven additional treatment sessions since the last color measurement, which had been made after an average of five treatments. The median length of follow-up was 9.5 years. On average, the stain when measured at follow-up was significantly darker than it was when measured after the last of the initial five laser treatments (P=0.001), but it was still significantly lighter than it was when measured before treatment (P<0.001). Fifty-nine percent of patients were satisfied with the overall treatment result. Six percent of patients reported that the stain had become lighter since their last treatment, 59% that it was unchanged, and 35% that it had become darker. CONCLUSIONS: Using objective color measurements, we observed significant redarkening of port-wine stains at long-term follow-up after pulsed-dye-laser therapy. Patients should be informed about the possibility of redarkening before beginning treatment. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Authors: Jennifer K Chen; Pedram Ghasri; Guillermo Aguilar; Anne Margreet van Drooge; Albert Wolkerstorfer; Kristen M Kelly; Michal Heger Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Thuy L Phung; Darryl A Oble; Wangcun Jia; Laura E Benjamin; Martin C Mihm; J Stuart Nelson Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Anne Marie Tremaine; Jennifer Armstrong; Yu-Chih Huang; Leila Elkeeb; Arisa Ortiz; Ronald Harris; Bernard Choi; Kristen M Kelly Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Jennifer Channual; Bernard Choi; Kathryn Osann; Daniel Pattanachinda; Justin Lotfi; Kristen M Kelly Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Joshua A Tournas; Jennifer Lai; Anne Truitt; Y C Huang; Kathryn E Osann; Bernard Choi; Kristen M Kelly Journal: Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 3.631