BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions is associated with variable and unpredictable efficacy. Thus, alternative treatment modalities are needed. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated enhanced selective vascular destruction with benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) monoacid ring A photodynamic therapy (PDT) followed immediately by PDL irradiation (PDT+PDL). Here, we evaluate PDT alone, PDL alone, and PDT+PDL protocols using an optimized in vivo rodent dorsal window chamber model. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dorsal window chamber was surgically installed on male Golden Syrian hamsters. BPD solution was administered intravenously via a jugular venous catheter. Evaluated interventions included: (1) Control (no BPD, no light); (2) Control (BPD, no light); (3) PDT alone (lambda = 576 nm; 25, 50, 75, or 96 J/cm2 radiant exposure; 15 minutes post-BPD injection); (4) PDL alone at 7 J/cm2 (585 nm, 1.5 milliseconds pulse duration, 7 mm spot); and (5) PDT (25 or 75 J/cm2)+PDL (7 J/cm2). Laser speckle imaging was used to monitor blood flow dynamics before, immediately after, and 1, 3, and 5 days post-intervention. RESULTS: Perfusion reduction on day 1 post-intervention was achieved with PDT>50 J/cm2, PDL alone, and PDT+PDL. However, by day 5 post-intervention, recovery of flow was observed with PDT alone at 50 J/cm2 (-15.1%) and PDL alone (+215%). PDT (75 J/cm2)+PDL resulted in the greatest prolonged reduction in vascular perfusion (-99.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our in vivo data suggest that the PDT+PDL therapeutic protocol can result in enhanced and persistent vascular shutdown compared to PDT or PDL alone. The PDT+PDL approach has potential for considerable superficial vascular destruction and should be considered as a treatment modality for cutaneous vascular lesions. Monitoring of blood flow changes for as long as possible is crucial for accurate assessment of light-based vascular interventions. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions is associated with variable and unpredictable efficacy. Thus, alternative treatment modalities are needed. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated enhanced selective vascular destruction with benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) monoacid ring A photodynamic therapy (PDT) followed immediately by PDL irradiation (PDT+PDL). Here, we evaluate PDT alone, PDL alone, and PDT+PDL protocols using an optimized in vivo rodent dorsal window chamber model. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dorsal window chamber was surgically installed on male Golden Syrian hamsters. BPD solution was administered intravenously via a jugular venous catheter. Evaluated interventions included: (1) Control (no BPD, no light); (2) Control (BPD, no light); (3) PDT alone (lambda = 576 nm; 25, 50, 75, or 96 J/cm2 radiant exposure; 15 minutes post-BPD injection); (4) PDL alone at 7 J/cm2 (585 nm, 1.5 milliseconds pulse duration, 7 mm spot); and (5) PDT (25 or 75 J/cm2)+PDL (7 J/cm2). Laser speckle imaging was used to monitor blood flow dynamics before, immediately after, and 1, 3, and 5 days post-intervention. RESULTS: Perfusion reduction on day 1 post-intervention was achieved with PDT>50 J/cm2, PDL alone, and PDT+PDL. However, by day 5 post-intervention, recovery of flow was observed with PDT alone at 50 J/cm2 (-15.1%) and PDL alone (+215%). PDT (75 J/cm2)+PDL resulted in the greatest prolonged reduction in vascular perfusion (-99.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our in vivo data suggest that the PDT+PDL therapeutic protocol can result in enhanced and persistent vascular shutdown compared to PDT or PDL alone. The PDT+PDL approach has potential for considerable superficial vascular destruction and should be considered as a treatment modality for cutaneous vascular lesions. Monitoring of blood flow changes for as long as possible is crucial for accurate assessment of light-based vascular interventions. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: M Sickenberg; U Schmidt-Erfurth; J W Miller; C J Pournaras; L Zografos; B Piguet; G Donati; H Laqua; I Barbazetto; E S Gragoudas; A M Lane; R Birngruber; H van den Bergh; H A Strong; U Manjuris; T Gray; M Fsadni; N M Bressler Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2000-03
Authors: Harvey Lui; Lori Hobbs; Whitney D Tope; Peter K Lee; Craig Elmets; Nathalie Provost; Agnes Chan; Herma Neyndorff; Xiang Yao Su; Hem Jain; Iltefat Hamzavi; David McLean; Robert Bissonnette Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2004-01
Authors: Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Wangcun Jia; Victor Sun; Nadia Tran; Bernard Choi; Shaiw-wen Liu; Martin C Mihm; Thuy L Phung; J Stuart Nelson Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Wangcun Jia; Nadia Tran; Victor Sun; Marko Marinček; Boris Majaron; Bernard Choi; J Stuart Nelson Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Bernard Choi; Wenbin Tan; Wangcun Jia; Sean M White; Wesley J Moy; Bruce Y Yang; Jiang Zhu; Zhongping Chen; Kristen M Kelly; J Stuart Nelson Journal: IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 4.544
Authors: Wesley J Moy; Shreyas J Patel; Ben S Lertsakdadet; Rajan P Arora; Katherine M Nielsen; Kristen M Kelly; Bernard Choi Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.025