Literature DB >> 17374598

No genomic mosaicism in a putative hybrid butterfly species.

Marcus R Kronforst1, Camilo Salazar, Mauricio Linares, Lawrence E Gilbert.   

Abstract

Recent descriptions of hybrid animal species have spurred interest in this phenomenon, but little genomic data exist to support it. Here, we use frequency variation for 657 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers and DNA sequence variation from 16 genes to determine whether the genome of Heliconius pachinus, a suspected hybrid butterfly species, is a mixture of the putative parental species, Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Despite substantial shared genetic variation among all three species, we show that the genome of H. pachinus is not a mosaic; both AFLP and DNA sequence data overwhelmingly associate H. pachinus with just one of the potential parents, H. cydno. This pattern also applies to the gene wingless, which is tightly linked to the locus that determines forewing colour-one specific H. pachinus trait that has been hypothesized to have originated from H. melpomene. As a whole, the data support a traditional, bifurcating model of speciation in which H. pachinus split from a common ancestor with H. cydno without a genetic contribution from H. melpomene. However, comparison of our data to DNA sequence data for another putative hybrid Heliconius species, Heliconius heurippa, suggests that the H. heurippa genome may be a mosaic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17374598      PMCID: PMC2176181          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software.

Authors:  S Kumar; K Tamura; I B Jakobsen; M Nei
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Speciation via introgressive hybridization in East African cichlids?

Authors:  W Salzburger; S Baric; C Sturmbauer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Hybrid origin of a cichlid population in Lake Malawi: implications for genetic variation and species diversity.

Authors:  Peter F Smith; Ad Konings; Irv Kornfield
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data.

Authors:  Johan A A Nylander; Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck; José Luis Nieves-Aldrey
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; James A Fordyce; Matthew L Forister; Arthur M Shapiro; Chris C Nice
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Margarita Beltrán; Chris D Jiggins; Vanessa Bull; Mauricio Linares; James Mallet; W Owen McMillan; Eldredge Bermingham
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Towards a better understanding of the higher systematics of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea).

Authors:  Niklas Wahlberg; Elisabet Weingartner; Sören Nylin
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.286

View more
  9 in total

1.  Population-genomic inference of the strength and timing of selection against gene flow.

Authors:  Simon Aeschbacher; Jessica P Selby; John H Willis; Graham Coop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Introgression of wing pattern alleles and speciation via homoploid hybridization in Heliconius butterflies: a review of evidence from the genome.

Authors:  Andrew V Z Brower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Comparative population genetics of a mimicry locus among hybridizing Heliconius butterfly species.

Authors:  N L Chamberlain; R I Hill; S W Baxter; C D Jiggins; M R Kronforst
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Review. Hybrid trait speciation and Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Chris D Jiggins; Camilo Salazar; Mauricio Linares; Jesus Mavarez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Hybrid speciation in Heliconius butterflies? A review and critique of the evidence.

Authors:  Andrew V Z Brower
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Sex chromosome mosaicism and hybrid speciation among tiger swallowtail butterflies.

Authors:  Krushnamegh Kunte; Cristina Shea; Matthew L Aardema; J Mark Scriber; Thomas E Juenger; Lawrence E Gilbert; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Gene flow persists millions of years after speciation in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Gene flow and the genealogical history of Heliconius heurippa.

Authors:  Camilo Salazar; Chris D Jiggins; Jesse E Taylor; Marcus R Kronforst; Mauricio Linares
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Hybridization reveals the evolving genomic architecture of speciation.

Authors:  Marcus R Kronforst; Matthew E B Hansen; Nicholas G Crawford; Jason R Gallant; Wei Zhang; Rob J Kulathinal; Durrell D Kapan; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 9.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.