Literature DB >> 21304546

Comparative population genetics of a mimicry locus among hybridizing Heliconius butterfly species.

N L Chamberlain1, R I Hill, S W Baxter, C D Jiggins, M R Kronforst.   

Abstract

The comimetic Heliconius butterfly species pair, H. erato and H. melpomene, appear to use a conserved Mendelian switch locus to generate their matching red wing patterns. Here we investigate whether H. cydno and H. pachinus, species closely related to H. melpomene, use this same switch locus to generate their highly divergent red and brown color pattern elements. Using an F2 intercross between H. cydno and H. pachinus, we first map the genomic positions of two novel red/brown wing pattern elements; the G locus, which controls the presence of red vs brown at the base of the ventral wings, and the Br locus, which controls the presence vs absence of a brown oval pattern on the ventral hind wing. The results reveal that the G locus is tightly linked to markers in the genomic interval that controls red wing pattern elements of H. erato and H. melpomene. Br is on the same linkage group but approximately 26 cM away. Next, we analyze fine-scale patterns of genetic differentiation and linkage disequilibrium throughout the G locus candidate interval in H. cydno, H. pachinus and H. melpomene, and find evidence for elevated differentiation between H. cydno and H. pachinus, but no localized signature of association. Overall, these results indicate that the G locus maps to the same interval as the locus controlling red patterning in H. melpomene and H. erato. This, in turn, suggests that the genes controlling red pattern elements may be homologous across Heliconius, supporting the hypothesis that Heliconius butterflies use a limited suite of conserved genetic switch loci to generate both convergent and divergent wing patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21304546      PMCID: PMC3119732          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  28 in total

Review 1.  The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation.

Authors:  Hopi E Hoekstra; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Genomic hotspots of adaptation in butterfly wing pattern evolution.

Authors:  Riccardo Papa; Arnaud Martin; Robert D Reed
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  A genetic linkage map of the mimetic butterfly Heliconius melpomene.

Authors:  Chris D Jiggins; Jesus Mavarez; Margarita Beltrán; W Owen McMillan; J Spencer Johnston; Eldredge Bermingham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Drosophila pigmentation evolution: divergent genotypes underlying convergent phenotypes.

Authors:  Patricia J Wittkopp; Barry L Williams; Jayne E Selegue; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato.

Authors:  Brian A Counterman; Felix Araujo-Perez; Heather M Hines; Simon W Baxter; Clay M Morrison; Daniel P Lindstrom; Riccardo Papa; Laura Ferguson; Mathieu Joron; Richard H Ffrench-Constant; Christopher P Smith; Dahlia M Nielsen; Rui Chen; Chris D Jiggins; Robert D Reed; Georg Halder; Jim Mallet; W Owen McMillan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in the Heliconius melpomene clade.

Authors:  Simon W Baxter; Nicola J Nadeau; Luana S Maroja; Paul Wilkinson; Brian A Counterman; Anna Dawson; Margarita Beltran; Silvia Perez-Espona; Nicola Chamberlain; Laura Ferguson; Richard Clark; Claire Davidson; Rebecca Glithero; James Mallet; W Owen McMillan; Marcus Kronforst; Mathieu Joron; Richard H Ffrench-Constant; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Localization of Müllerian mimicry genes on a dense linkage map of Heliconius erato.

Authors:  Durrell D Kapan; Nicola S Flanagan; Alex Tobler; Riccardo Papa; Robert D Reed; Jenny Acevedo Gonzalez; Manuel Ramirez Restrepo; Lournet Martinez; Karla Maldonado; Clare Ritschoff; David G Heckel; W Owen McMillan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The genetic basis of phenotypic convergence in beach mice: similar pigment patterns but different genes.

Authors:  Cynthia C Steiner; Holger Römpler; Linda M Boettger; Torsten Schöneberg; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 9.  The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution?

Authors:  David L Stern; Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Gene flow persists millions of years after speciation in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hearing echoes.

Authors:  Y F Chan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  The functional basis of wing patterning in Heliconius butterflies: the molecules behind mimicry.

Authors:  Marcus R Kronforst; Riccardo Papa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Introgression of wing pattern alleles and speciation via homoploid hybridization in Heliconius butterflies: a review of evidence from the genome.

Authors:  Andrew V Z Brower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Rampant Genome-Wide Admixture across the Heliconius Radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof M Kozak; Mathieu Joron; W Owen McMillan; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Multiple recent co-options of Optix associated with novel traits in adaptive butterfly wing radiations.

Authors:  Arnaud Martin; Kyle J McCulloch; Nipam H Patel; Adriana D Briscoe; Lawrence E Gilbert; Robert D Reed
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.250

6.  Hybridization reveals the evolving genomic architecture of speciation.

Authors:  Marcus R Kronforst; Matthew E B Hansen; Nicholas G Crawford; Jason R Gallant; Wei Zhang; Rob J Kulathinal; Durrell D Kapan; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 9.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.