Literature DB >> 17374591

Ancestrally high elastic modulus of gecko setal beta-keratin.

Anne M Peattie1, Carmel Majidi, Andrew Corder, Robert J Full.   

Abstract

Typical bulk adhesives are characterized by soft, tacky materials with elastic moduli well below 1MPa. Geckos possess subdigital adhesives composed mostly of beta-keratin, a relatively stiff material. Biological adhesives like those of geckos have inspired empirical and modelling research which predicts that even stiff materials can be effective adhesives if they take on a fibrillar form. The molecular structure of beta-keratin is highly conserved across birds and reptiles, suggesting that material properties of gecko setae should be similar to that of beta-keratin previously measured in birds, but this has yet to be established. We used a resonance technique to measure elastic bending modulus in two species of gecko from disparate habitats. We found no significant difference in elastic modulus between Gekko gecko (1.6 GPa +/- 0.15s.e.; n=24 setae) and Ptyodactylus hasselquistii (1.4 GPa +/- 0.15s.e.; n=24 setae). If the elastic modulus of setal keratin is conserved across species, it would suggest a design constraint that must be compensated for structurally, and possibly explain the remarkable variation in gecko adhesive morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17374591      PMCID: PMC2396203          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  20 in total

1.  Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays.

Authors:  K Autumn; C Majidi; R E Groff; A Dittmore; R Fearing
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae.

Authors:  W R Hansen; K Autumn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one?

Authors:  Tian Tang; Chung-Yuen Hui; Nicholas J Glassmaker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact.

Authors:  N J Glassmaker; T Himeno; C-Y Hui; J Kim
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems.

Authors:  Ralph Spolenak; Stanislav Gorb; Eduard Arzt
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  High friction from a stiff polymer using microfiber arrays.

Authors:  C Majidi; R E Groff; Y Maeno; B Schubert; S Baek; B Bush; R Maboudian; N Gravish; M Wilkinson; K Autumn; R S Fearing
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Mechanics of adhesion through a fibrillar microstructure.

Authors:  Anand Jagota; Stephen J Bennison
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  The molecular structure of reptilian keratin.

Authors:  R D Fraser; D A Parry
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.953

9.  Disulfide bonds in the outer layer of keratin fibers confer higher mechanical rigidity: correlative nano-indentation and elasticity measurement with an AFM.

Authors:  A N Parbhu; W G Bryson; R Lal
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  The Young's modulus of feather keratin

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. II. Microscale behaviour.

Authors:  Bryan Schubert; Jongho Lee; Carmel Majidi; Ronald S Fearing
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour.

Authors:  Jongho Lee; Carmel Majidi; Bryan Schubert; Ronald S Fearing
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment.

Authors:  Nick Gravish; Matt Wilkinson; Kellar Autumn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives.

Authors:  A M Peattie; R J Full
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Functional demands of dynamic biological adhesion: an integrative approach.

Authors:  Anne M Peattie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.200

6.  Pre-tension generates strongly reversible adhesion of a spatula pad on substrate.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Peidong Wu; Huajian Gao
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  How do the substrate reaction forces acting on a gecko's limbs respond to inclines?

Authors:  Zhouyi Wang; Zhendong Dai; Wei Li; Aihong Ji; Wenbao Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-02-03

8.  Experimental evidence for friction-enhancing integumentary modifications of chameleons and associated functional and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Eraqi R Khannoon; Thomas Endlein; Anthony P Russell; Kellar Autumn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Viscoelastic features of adhesive setae of the tokay gecko (Gekko gecko L.).

Authors:  Yu F Ivlev; A I Il'in; O V Trofimov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-20

10.  Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae.

Authors:  Nick Gravish; Matt Wilkinson; Simon Sponberg; Aaron Parness; Noe Esparza; Daniel Soto; Tetsuo Yamaguchi; Michael Broide; Mark Cutkosky; Costantino Creton; Kellar Autumn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.