Literature DB >> 17374387

Characterization of DNA reactive and non-DNA reactive anticancer drugs by gene expression profiling.

Anne-Celine Le Fevre1, Eric Boitier, Jean-Pierre Marchandeau, Alain Sarasin, Veronique Thybaud.   

Abstract

Gene expression profiling technology is expected to advance our understanding of genotoxic mechanisms involving direct or indirect interaction with DNA. We exposed human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells to 14 anticancer drugs (vincristine, paclitaxel, etoposide, daunorubicin, camptothecin, amsacrine, cytosine arabinoside, hydroxyurea, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU), 1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), and bleomycin) for 4-h and examined them immediately or after a 20-h recovery period. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, respectively, were evaluated by cell counting and by in vitro micronucleus assay at 24h. Effects on the cell cycle were determined by flow cytometry at 4 and 24h. Gene expression was profiled at both sampling times by using human Affymetrix U133A GeneChips (22K). Bioanalysis was done with Resolver/Rosetta software and an in-house annotation program. Cell cycle analysis and gene expression profiling allowed us to classify the drugs according to their mechanisms of action. The molecular signature is composed of 28 marker genes mainly involved in signal transduction and cell cycle pathways. Our results suggest that these marker genes could be used as a predictive model to classify genotoxins according to their direct or indirect interaction with DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17374387     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  6 in total

1.  Characterization and interlaboratory comparison of a gene expression signature for differentiating genotoxic mechanisms.

Authors:  Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; Jennifer M Fostel; Chinami Aruga; Daniel Bauer; Eric Boitier; Shibing Deng; Donna Dickinson; Anne-Celine Le Fevre; Albert J Fornace; Olivier Grenet; Yizhong Gu; Jean-Christophe Hoflack; Masako Shiiyama; Roger Smith; Ronald D Snyder; Catherine Spire; Gotaro Tanaka; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  DNA microarray-based gene expression profiling of estrogenic chemicals.

Authors:  Ryoiti Kiyama; Yun Zhu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Effect of chemical mutagens and carcinogens on gene expression profiles in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Lode Godderis; Reuben Thomas; Alan E Hubbard; Ali M Tabish; Peter Hoet; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Hendrik Veulemans; Cliona M McHale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of genotoxicity of vincristine, vinblastine and vinorelbine in human cultured lymphocytes: a comparative study.

Authors:  N M Mhaidat; K H Alzoubi; O F Khabour; K Z Alawneh; L A Raffee; E S Alsatari; E I Hussein; K E Bani-Hani
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 0.519

5.  High-content imaging analyses of γH2AX-foci and micronuclei in TK6 cells elucidated genotoxicity of chemicals and their clastogenic/aneugenic mode of action.

Authors:  Akira Takeiri; Kaori Matsuzaki; Shigeki Motoyama; Mariko Yano; Asako Harada; Chiaki Katoh; Kenji Tanaka; Masayuki Mishima
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2019-02-05

6.  Comparative Analysis of Transcriptional Responses to Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Agents in the Blood Cell Model TK6 and the Liver Model HepaRG.

Authors:  Katrin Kreuzer; Heike Sprenger; Albert Braeuning
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.