Literature DB >> 17371741

Development of an e-mail database of US intensive care physicians.

Scott D Halpern1, Sophia A Hussen, Thomas S Metkus, Nicholas S Ward, John M Luce, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although surveying critical care physicians regarding their behaviors and attitudes may usefully inform clinical, ethical, and policy questions, few resources exist for surveying intensivists electronically. We sought to develop an e-mail database for all intensivists associated with US training programs in critical care medicine (academic intensivists) and to determine the feasibility of using this database to survey intensivists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained e-mail addresses for academic intensivists by consulting each training program's institutional Web site or contacting program directors directly. We sent presumed intensivists up to 3 e-mail invitations to participate in an initial survey.
RESULTS: We identified 2858 potential intensivists and obtained operative e-mail addresses for 2494 (87%). Only 31 (9%) of the remaining intensivists were members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, suggesting that most of those without identified addresses were not intensivists. During the conduct of an initial survey, 161 physicians self-identified themselves as nonintensivists; of the remaining 2333 presumed intensivists, 1026 (44%) responded and 44 (2%) opted out. The response rate of 44% is based on the conservative assumptions that the remaining 1263 physicians were intensivists and saw the e-mail invitation.
CONCLUSIONS: This database provides a unique resource for investigators wishing to efficiently identify the views and practice patterns of US academic intensivists and provides a benchmark response rate of approximately 44% for electronic surveys of intensivists.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371741     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  6 in total

1.  Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Rachel Kohn; Aaron Dornbrand-Lo; Thomas Metkus; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Rule of rescue or the good of the many? An analysis of physicians' and nurses' preferences for allocating ICU beds.

Authors:  Rachel Kohn; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mitchell M Levy; Peter A Ubel; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Worklife and satisfaction of hospitalists: toward flourishing careers.

Authors:  Keiki Hinami; Chad T Whelan; Robert J Wolosin; Joseph A Miller; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A scenario-based, randomized trial of patient values and functional prognosis on intensivist intent to discuss withdrawing life support.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Jenna R Krall; A Parker Ruhl; J Randall Curtis; Scott D Halpern; Bryan M Lau; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  ICU Attending Handoff Practices: Results From a National Survey of Academic Intensivists.

Authors:  Meghan B Lane-Fall; Meredith L Collard; Alison E Turnbull; Scott D Halpern; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Cristi L O'Connor; Bryan Lau; Scott D Halpern; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.