Literature DB >> 17371164

Genetic effects on bone mechanotransduction in congenic mice harboring bone size and strength quantitative trait loci.

Alexander G Robling1, Stuart J Warden, Kathryn L Shultz, Wesley G Beamer, Charles H Turner.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The degree to which bone tissue responds to mechanical loading events is partially under genetic control. We assess the contribution of three genetic loci (QTLs linked to bone geometry and strength)--located on mouse Chrs. 1, 8, and 13--to mechanically stimulated bone formation, through in vivo skeletal loading of congenic strains. Bone size was not consistently associated with mechano-responsiveness, indicating that the genetic regulation of mechanotransduction is a complex process that involves a number of genes and is sex-specific.
INTRODUCTION: We showed previously that C57BL/6J (B6) mice are more responsive to mechanical stimulation than C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice and that B6 mice harboring a 40-Mb region of distal C3H Chromosome (Chr.) 4 are more responsive to mechanical stimulation than are fully B6 mice. Here, we assess the contribution of three more genetic loci--located on mouse Chrs. 1, 8, and 1--to mechanically stimulated bone formation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three congenic mouse strains were created in which a region of mouse Chr. 1 (approximately 64 cM; 150 Mb), Chr. 8 (approximately 45 cM; 86 Mb), or Chr. 13 (approximately 24 cM; 42 Mb) was moved from C3H stock to a B6 background through selective breeding over nine generations. The regions moved to the B6 background correspond to three of several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) identified for bone size and strength. The resulting congenic mice were 99% B6, with the remaining genomic DNA comprised of the Chr. 1, 8, or 13 QTLs of interest. Male and female congenic (1T, 8T, and 13B) and B6 control mice were subjected to in vivo loading of the right ulna at one of three different load magnitudes. A separate set of animals from each group had strain gauges applied at the ulnar midshaft to estimate strain at each loading level. Loading was conducted once per day for 3 days (60 cycles/d; 2 Hz). Fluorochrome labels were injected intraperitoneally 4 and 11 days after loading began. Using quantitative histomorphometry, bone formation rates were measured in loaded (right) and control (left) ulnas.
RESULTS: All male congenic mice exhibited significantly reduced mechano-responsiveness compared with male B6 controls, but the same comparison among females yielded no difference from controls, with the exception of the 1T congenics, which showed increased responsiveness to loading. Among the congenic strains, smaller bone size was not consistently associated with reduced mechano-responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the genetic regulation of mechanotransduction is a complex process that involves a number of genes and is sex-specific. Our data might explain why different individuals can engage in similar exercise protocols yet experience different results in terms of bone mass accrual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371164     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.070327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  16 in total

1.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Determination of forces on a split palatal screw after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Valentin Javier García; Rubén López-Cancelos; Antonio Riveiro; Rafael Comesaña; Josep Maria Ustrell I Torrent; Khaled Kasem; Aida Badaoui; Mª Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes; Patricia Carvalho-Lobato
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Musculoskeletal Health in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Jillian M Clark; David M Findlay
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Midhumerus adaptation in fast-pitch softballers and the effect of throwing mechanics.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Bogenschutz; Heather D Smith; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Leptin receptor (Lepr) is a negative modulator of bone mechanosensitivity and genetic variations in Lepr may contribute to the differential osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in the C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ pair of mouse strains.

Authors:  Sonia Kapur; Mehran Amoui; Chandrasekhar Kesavan; Xiaoguang Wang; Subburaman Mohan; David J Baylink; K-H William Lau
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Variation in within-bone stiffness measured by nanoindentation in mice bred for high levels of voluntary wheel running.

Authors:  Kevin M Middleton; Beth D Goldstein; Pradeep R Guduru; Julie F Waters; Scott A Kelly; Sharon M Swartz; T Garland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Mechanical stimulation and intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment induce disproportional osteogenic, geometric, and biomechanical effects in growing mouse bone.

Authors:  Maureen E McAteer; Paul J Niziolek; Shana N Ellis; Daniel L Alge; Alexander G Robling
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Functional adaptation to loading of a single bone is neuronally regulated and involves multiple bones.

Authors:  Susannah J Sample; Mary Behan; Lesley Smith; William E Oldenhoff; Mark D Markel; Vicki L Kalscheur; Zhengling Hao; Vjekoslav Miletic; Peter Muir
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Functional significance of genetic variation underlying limb bone diaphyseal structure.

Authors:  Ian J Wallace; Kevin M Middleton; Svetlana Lublinsky; Scott A Kelly; Stefan Judex; Theodore Garland; Brigitte Demes
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Role of Nonbehavioral Factors in Adjusting Long Bone Diaphyseal Structure in Free-ranging Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  K J Carlson; D R Sumner; M E Morbeck; T Nishida; A Yamanaka; C Boesch
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.