Literature DB >> 17369564

Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening?

Emma Beardsley, Michael Jefford, Linda Mileshkin.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17369564     DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN： 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


× No keyword cloud information.
  44 in total

1.  Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem.

Authors:  M Jefford; L Mileshkin; J Matthews; H Raunow; C O'Kane; T Cavicchiolo; H Brasier; M Anderson; J Reynolds
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Patients' understanding of clinical trials needs to be assessed in the context of understanding of overall goals of care.

Authors:  Jaclyn Yoong; Michael Jefford; Linda Mileshkin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Length and complexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Lelia Chaisson; Holly A Taylor; Jennifer Lohse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Thipaporn Tharavanij; Kittichet Phiphatpatthamaamphan; Ratha-Korn Vilaichone; Sudsayam Manuwong; Parichat Curry; Sith Siramolpiwat; Thanachai Punchaipornpon; Supakit Kanitnate; Nattapol Tammachote; Rodsarin Yamprasert; Waipoj Chanvimalueng; Ruchirat Kaewkumpai; Soiphet Netanong; Peerapong Kitipawong; Paskorn Sritipsukho; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Emilia Niemiec; Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Bioethics In Practice: Understanding Understood Consent.

Authors:  Robert J Vasquez
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

7.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Shortening Informed Consent Forms in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Amy Corneli; Emily Namey; Monique P Mueller; Jenae Tharaldson; Steve Sortijas; Thomas Grey; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.

Authors:  Rebekah E McWhirter; Lisa Eckstein
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 9.  Easy-to-read informed consent forms for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical trials.

Authors:  Ellen M Denzen; Martha E Burton Santibáñez; Heather Moore; Amy Foley; Iris D Gersten; Cathy Gurgol; Navneet S Majhail; Ryan Spellecy; Mary M Horowitz; Elizabeth A Murphy
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS).

Authors:  I Juraskova; P Butow; A Lopez; M Seccombe; A Coates; F Boyle; N McCarthy; L Reaby; J F Forbes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.