Literature DB >> 17368414

Development and evaluation of high-fidelity simulation case scenarios for pediatric resident education.

Mark D Adler1, Jennifer L Trainor, Viva Jo Siddall, William C McGaghie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric residency programs need objective methods of trainee assessment. Patient simulation can contribute to objective evaluation of acute care event management skills. We describe the development and validation of 4 simulation case scenarios for pediatric resident evaluation.
METHODS: We created 4 pediatric simulation cases: apnea, asthma, supraventricular tachycardia, and sepsis. Each case contains a scenario and an unweighted checklist. Case and checklist development began by reaching expert consensus about case content followed by 92 pilot simulation sessions used for content revision and rater training. After development, 54 first-and second-year pediatric residents participated in 108 simulation test cases to assess the validity of data from these tools for our population. We report outcomes for interrater reliability, discriminant validity, and the impact of potential confounding factors on validity estimates.
RESULTS: Interrater reliability (kappa) ranged from 0.75 to 0.87. There were statistically and educationally significant differences in summary scores between first-and second-year residents for 3 of the 4 cases. Neither previous simulation exposure nor the order in which the cases were performed were found to be significant factors by multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulation can be used to reliably measure and discriminate resident competencies in acute care management. Rigorous measurement development work is difficult and time-consuming. Done correctly, measurement development yields tangible and lasting benefits for trainees, faculty, and residency programs. Development studies that use systematic procedures and large trainee samples at multiple sites are the best approach to creating measurement tools that yield valid data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368414     DOI: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambul Pediatr        ISSN: 1530-1567


  15 in total

1.  Electronic device for endosurgical skills training (EDEST): study of reliability.

Authors:  J B Pagador; J Uson; M A Sánchez; J L Moyano; J Moreno; P Bustos; J Mateos; F M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Medical simulation in respiratory and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Godfrey Lam; Najib T Ayas; Donald E Griesdale; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Prospective comparison of live evaluation and video review in the evaluation of operator performance in a pediatric emergency airway simulation.

Authors:  Joseph B House; Suzanne Dooley-Hash; Terry Kowalenko; Athina Sikavitsas; Desiree M Seeyave; John G Younger; Stanley J Hamstra; Michele M Nypaver
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-09

4.  Does simulation booster impact retention of resuscitation procedural skills and teamwork?

Authors:  J Bender; K Kennally; R Shields; F Overly
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Fixed versus variable practice for teaching medical students the management of pediatric asthma exacerbations using simulation.

Authors:  David Drummond; Jennifer Truchot; Eleonora Fabbro; Pierre-François Ceccaldi; Patrick Plaisance; Antoine Tesnière; Alice Hadchouel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Senior pediatric residents as teachers for an innovative multidisciplinary mock code curriculum.

Authors:  Alison Sweeney; Alyssa Stephany; Shari Whicker; Jack Bookman; David A Turner
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-06

7.  Development and validation of a virtual human vignette to compare nurses' assessment and intervention choices for pain in critically ill children.

Authors:  Cynthia M LaFond; Catherine Van Hulle Vincent; Sangyoon Lee; Colleen Corte; Patricia E Hershberger; Andrew Johnson; Chang G Park; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  Do medical students' scores using different assessment instruments predict their scores in clinical reasoning using a computer-based simulation?

Authors:  Mariam Fida; Salah Eldin Kassab
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-02-20

9.  Simulation as a high stakes assessment tool in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Fenton O'Leary
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 10.  Review of Simulation in Pediatrics: The Evolution of a Revolution.

Authors:  Rahul Ojha; Anthony Liu; Deepak Rai; Ralph Nanan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.