Literature DB >> 17366049

Pooling of urine specimens allows accurate and cost-effective genetic detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Lithuania and other low-resource countries.

Rita Butylkina1, Violeta Juseviciute, Giedre Kasparaviciene, Andrius Vagoras, Egidijus Pagirskas, Magnus Unemo, Marius Domeika.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare performance characteristics and cost-effectiveness of pooling urine samples for screening and diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using Digene Hybrid Capture II CT/NG Test (HCII), and to examine the prevalence of C. trachomatis in male military recruits in Lithuania. A total of 410 urine samples were individually tested and pooled by 5 and 10 samples, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis were not affected by either pooling strategy. The estimated population prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was nearly identical, i.e. 4.4%, 4.4% and 4.1% based on individually tested samples, and samples pooled by 5 and 10, respectively. For this estimation of the population prevalence, pooling 5 samples reduced the costs by 80% and pooling 10 samples reduced the costs by 90%. For diagnosis of each individual sample, the pooling strategies resulted in cost savings of 60% (5 samples per pool) and 56% (10 samples per pool). The present pooling strategies were sensitive, specific and cost-efficient for screening and diagnosis of C. trachomatis infection in male military recruits in Lithuania. The strategies would be most useful for reasonably inexpensive large-scale screening, prevalence studies and even diagnostics in Lithuania and many other low-resource countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17366049     DOI: 10.1080/00365540600978914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0036-5548


  2 in total

1.  Informative Dorfman screening.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Informative Retesting.

Authors:  Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs; Peng Chen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.