Literature DB >> 17365931

Hospital-acquired and community-acquired acute renal failure in hospitalized Chinese: a ten-year review.

Yue Wang1, Zhuan Cui, Minhua Fan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference between hospital-acquired acute renal failure (HA-ARF) and community-acquired acute renal failure (CA-ARF) in hospitalized Chinese.
METHODS: The diagnosis of ARF in Peking University Third Hospital from January 1994 to December 2003 was reconfirmed and subdivided into AC-ARF and HA-ARF. Data of epidemiology, etiology, prognosis, and associated factors were analyzed. Single-variable analysis and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between clinical features and prognosis respectively. Results among 205 reconfirmed CA-ARF had a predominance of 59.5%, but HA-ARF demonstrated an increase by 1.06 during the last five years (p = 0.003). In all, 70.5% CA-ARF was diagnosed in internal medicine with 45.9% in department of nephrology, whereas 59.1% HA-ARF was diagnosed in surgical department with 51.8% in ICU. Distribution difference among departments was significant (p < 0.01). Further, 90.2% CA-ARF was associated with a single factor, while 36.1% of HA-ARF had two or more causes (p < 0.01). Also, 26.5% HA-ARF and 18.9% CA-ARF was drug-associated (p > 0.05) while 24.1% HA-ARF and 12.3% CA-ARF was infection-associated (p < 0.01). HA-ARF vs. CA-ARF was 62.7% vs. 23.0% in mortality (p < 0.01), 0.54 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.27 +/- 0.18 in ATI-ISS index (p < 0.01) and 19.6 +/- 4.9 vs. 15.7 +/- 5.6 in APACHE II scores (p < 0.01). MODS and SIRS were common independent predictors with oliguria for HA-ARF and advanced age for CA-ARF, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized Chinese during the last ten years, CA-ARF was still predominant with simpler cause and lower mortality, whereas HA-ARF was increasing with more complicated cause and higher mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365931     DOI: 10.1080/08860220601095918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


  19 in total

1.  Development of inpatient risk stratification models of acute kidney injury for use in electronic health records.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Randolph A Miller; T Alp Ikizler; Lemuel R Waitman; Joshua C Denny; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Robert S Dittus; Josh F Peterson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  National Veterans Health Administration inpatient risk stratification models for hospital-acquired acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Robert M Cronin; Jacob P VanHouten; Edward D Siew; Svetlana K Eden; Stephan D Fihn; Christopher D Nielson; Josh F Peterson; Clifton R Baker; T Alp Ikizler; Theodore Speroff; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Krt5+ urothelial cells are developmental and tissue repair progenitors in the kidney.

Authors:  Ashley R Jackson; Monica L Hoff; Birong Li; Christina B Ching; Kirk M McHugh; Brian Becknell
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2019-07-19

4.  The Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-08-13

5.  A Prospective International Multicenter Study of AKI in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Josée Bouchard; Anjali Acharya; Jorge Cerda; Elizabeth R Maccariello; Rajasekara Chakravarthi Madarasu; Ashita J Tolwani; Xinling Liang; Ping Fu; Zhi-Hong Liu; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 7.  Acute kidney injury in the elderly population.

Authors:  Rahmi Yilmaz; Yunus Erdem
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Epidemiology and Clinical Correlates of AKI in Chinese Hospitalized Adults.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Sheng Nie; Zhangsuo Liu; Chunbo Chen; Gang Xu; Yan Zha; Jing Qian; Bicheng Liu; Shuai Han; Anping Xu; Xing Xu; Fan Fan Hou
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Nephrotoxicity and Chinese Herbal Medicine.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Yun Xie; Maojuan Guo; Mitchell H Rosner; Hongtao Yang; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Acute kidney injury predicts outcomes of non-critically ill patients.

Authors:  Fidel Barrantes; Yan Feng; Oleg Ivanov; Hima B Yalamanchili; Janki Patel; Xander Buenafe; Vicky Cheng; Sylvester Dijeh; Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong; Constantine A Manthous
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.