Literature DB >> 17364204

Bi-socket ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: high versus low femoral socket placement.

Yukiyoshi Toritsuka1, Hiroshi Amano, Yuzo Yamada, Masayuki Hamada, Tomoki Mitsuoka, Shuji Horibe, Konsei Shino.   

Abstract

To clarify the importance of the femoral socket location in bi-socket Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Subjects included 261 patients with an average age of 26 years who received ACL reconstruction via the high-femoral socket procedure (Group H) and 43 patients with an average age of 29 years who received ACL reconstruction via the low-femoral socket procedure (Group L) with a minimal follow-up of 24 months. In Group H, the femoral sockets were created at 1:00 or 11:00 and 2:00-2:30 or 9:30-10:00 of the intercondylar notch. In Group L, the two femoral sockets were drilled at 2:00 or 10:00 and 3:00 or 9:00. For the tibial side, a single tunnel was made at the center of the footprint. Evaluation was performed based on the IKDC Knee Examination Form. While 137 knees (52%) were graded as normal, 100 (38%) as nearly normal, 8 (3%) as abnormal, and 2 (1%) as severely abnormal with 14 (5%) re-injury in Group H, 38 knees (74%) were graded as normal, and 7 (16%) as nearly normal with 3 (7%) re-injury in Group L, showing a better subjective evaluation (P = 0.007). The average side-to-side differences in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-1000 were 1.1 +/- 1.6 mm for Group H and 1.0 +/- 1.6 mm for Group L without statistically significant differences excluding re-injured cases. There were 204 patients (83%) from Group H and 33 (83%) from Group L with values between -2 and 2 mm, while 228 (92%) patients from Group H and 38 (95%) from Group L had values distributed between -3 and 3 mm. While the bi-socket ACL reconstruction provided objectively satisfactory clinical outcomes in more than 90% of the patients, the low-femoral socket placement was found to subjectively achieve better outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17364204     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0304-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  29 in total

1.  Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: A prospective study.

Authors:  M Hamada; K Shino; S Horibe; T Mitsuoka; T Miyama; Y Shiozaki; T Mae
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.

Authors:  John C Loh; Yukihisa Fukuda; Eiichi Tsuda; Richard J Steadman; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads.

Authors:  Mary T Gabriel; Eric K Wong; Savio L-Y Woo; Masayoshi Yagi; Richard E Debski
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Gauti Laxdal; Jüri Kartus; Leif Hansson; Mats Heidvall; Lars Ejerhed; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up.

Authors:  A K Aune; I Holm; M A Risberg; H K Jensen; H Steen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Comparison between the cross-sectional area of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts and multistranded hamstring tendon grafts obtained from the same patients.

Authors:  Y Toritsuka; S Horibe; T Mitsuoka; N Nakamura; M Hamada; K Shino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft.

Authors:  S M Howell; M A Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A comparison of outcomes at 2 to 6 years after acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  V K Goradia; W A Grana
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Quadrupled semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year results in patients without meniscus loss.

Authors:  V J Cooley; K T Deffner; T D Rosenberg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons.

Authors:  R A Marder; J R Raskind; M Carroll
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the clock face representation as used to describe the femoral intercondylar notch.

Authors:  Michael G Azzam; Christopher J Lenarz; Lutul D Farrow; Heidi A Israel; David A Kieffer; Scott G Kaar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons.

Authors:  Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Hiroshi Amano; Masahiro Kuwano; Takao Iwai; Tatsuo Mae; Kenji Ohzono; Konsei Shino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Outcome of anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach.

Authors:  Hiroshi Amano; Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Ryohei Uchida; Tatsuo Mae; Kenji Ohzono; Konsei Shino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.