RATIONALE: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is due to upper airway obstruction and is associated with increased morbidity. Although continuous positive airway pressure efficaciously treats obstructive apneas and hypopneas, treatment is impeded by low adherence rates. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy on obstructive sleep apnea of a minimally intrusive method for delivering warm and humidified air through an open nasal cannula. METHODS: Eleven subjects (age, 49.7+/-5.0 yr; body mass index, 30.5+/-4.3 kg/m2), with obstructive apnea-hypopnea syndrome ranging from mild to severe (5 to 60 events/h), were administered warm and humidified air at 20 L/minute through an open nasal cannula. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements were based on standard sleep-disordered breathing and arousal indices. In a subset of patients pharyngeal pressure and ventilation were assessed to determine the mechanism of action of treatment with nasal insufflation. Treatment with nasal insufflation reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea index from 28+/-5 to 10+/-3 events per hour (p<0.01), and reduced the respiratory arousal index from 18+/-2 to 8+/-2 events per hour (p<0.01). Treatment with nasal insufflation reduced the apnea-hypopnea index to fewer than 10 events per hour in 8 of 11 subjects, and to fewer than 5 events per hour in 4 subjects. The mechanism of action appears to be through an increase in end-expiratory pharyngeal pressure, which alleviated upper airway obstruction and improved ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate clinical proof of concept that a nasal cannula for insufflating high airflows can be used to treat a diverse group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
RATIONALE: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is due to upper airway obstruction and is associated with increased morbidity. Although continuous positive airway pressure efficaciously treats obstructive apneas and hypopneas, treatment is impeded by low adherence rates. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy on obstructive sleep apnea of a minimally intrusive method for delivering warm and humidified air through an open nasal cannula. METHODS: Eleven subjects (age, 49.7+/-5.0 yr; body mass index, 30.5+/-4.3 kg/m2), with obstructive apnea-hypopnea syndrome ranging from mild to severe (5 to 60 events/h), were administered warm and humidified air at 20 L/minute through an open nasal cannula. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements were based on standard sleep-disordered breathing and arousal indices. In a subset of patients pharyngeal pressure and ventilation were assessed to determine the mechanism of action of treatment with nasal insufflation. Treatment with nasal insufflation reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea index from 28+/-5 to 10+/-3 events per hour (p<0.01), and reduced the respiratory arousal index from 18+/-2 to 8+/-2 events per hour (p<0.01). Treatment with nasal insufflation reduced the apnea-hypopnea index to fewer than 10 events per hour in 8 of 11 subjects, and to fewer than 5 events per hour in 4 subjects. The mechanism of action appears to be through an increase in end-expiratory pharyngeal pressure, which alleviated upper airway obstruction and improved ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate clinical proof of concept that a nasal cannula for insufflating high airflows can be used to treat a diverse group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Authors: C W Whitney; D J Gottlieb; S Redline; R G Norman; R R Dodge; E Shahar; S Surovec; F J Nieto Journal: Sleep Date: 1998-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Terri E Weaver; Greg Maislin; David F Dinges; Joel Younger; Charles Cantor; Susan McCloskey; Allan I Pack Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: R C Heinzer; M L Stanchina; A Malhotra; A S Jordan; S R Patel; Y-L Lo; A Wellman; K Schory; L Dover; D P White Journal: Thorax Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Christopher L Drake; Ryan Day; David Hudgel; Yevgeniy Stefadu; Mary Parks; Mary Lou Syron; Thomas Roth Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Brian McGinley; Ann Halbower; Alan R Schwartz; Philip L Smith; Susheel P Patil; Hartmut Schneider Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 7.124