Literature DB >> 14572127

Self-efficacy in sleep apnea: instrument development and patient perceptions of obstructive sleep apnea risk, treatment benefit, and volition to use continuous positive airway pressure.

Terri E Weaver1, Greg Maislin, David F Dinges, Joel Younger, Charles Cantor, Susan McCloskey, Allan I Pack.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) designed to assess adherence-related cognitions.
DESIGN: Subjects completed the questionnaire prior to the initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. Test-retest reliability of the instrument was evaluated by having a subset of subjects complete the SEMSA a second time at home, 1 week later, returning the questionnaire by mail. PATIENTS: 213 subjects with newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea were recruited from the clinic populations of 2 sleep disorders centers. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Content validity was confirmed by a panel of expert judges. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the 3 a priori sub-scales: risk perception, outcome expectancies, and treatment self-efficacy. The internal consistency of the total instrument was 0.92. Test-retest reliability coefficients (N = 20) were estimated to be 0.68, P = 0.001, for Perceived Risk; 0.77, P more more than 0.0001, for Outcome Expectancies; and 0.71, P = 0.0005, for the Treatment Self-Efficacy subscale. Subject responses indicated that approximately half of the subjects did not perceive problems with concentration, sexual performance, sleepy driving, or an accident as related to sleep apnea. More than 60% of the subjects acknowledged most of the benefits of CPAP presented to them, but only 53% associated CPAP use with enhanced sexual performance. Frequently identified barriers to treatment use were nasal stuffiness, claustrophobia, and disturbing bed partner sleep.
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the SEMSA has strong psychometric properties and has the potential for identifying patient perceptions that may indicate those most likely to not adhere to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572127     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/26.6.727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  65 in total

1.  Toward a multi-level approach to CPAP adherence.

Authors:  Alec B Platt; Nirav P Patel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  Factors that influence CPAP adherence: an overview.

Authors:  Gilla K Shapiro; Colin M Shapiro
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Do cognitive perceptions influence CPAP use?

Authors:  Amy M Sawyer; Anne Canamucio; Helene Moriarty; Terri E Weaver; Kathy C Richards; Samuel T Kuna
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 4.  New developments in the use of positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Lucas M Donovan; Schafer Boeder; Atul Malhotra; Sanjay R Patel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  The association of age, insomnia, and self-efficacy with continuous positive airway pressure adherence in black, white, and Hispanic U.S. Veterans.

Authors:  Douglas M Wallace; Shirin Shafazand; Mark S Aloia; William K Wohlgemuth
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 6.  Patient-centered care in obstructive sleep apnea: A vision for the future.

Authors:  Janet Hilbert; Henry K Yaggi
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 11.609

Review 7.  An integrated approach to managing sleep disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Robin J Trupp; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  A brief survey of patients' first impression after CPAP titration predicts future CPAP adherence: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jay S Balachandran; Xiaohong Yu; Kristen Wroblewski; Babak Mokhlesi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Sleep health, diseases, and pain syndromes: findings from an electronic health record biobank.

Authors:  Hassan S Dashti; Brian E Cade; Gerda Stutaite; Richa Saxena; Susan Redline; Elizabeth W Karlson
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Treatment of sleep disorders after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Richard J Castriotta; Strahil Atanasov; Mark C Wilde; Brent E Masel; Jenny M Lai; Samuel T Kuna
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.