RATIONALE: Computed tomography (CT) scanning of the lung may reduce phenotypic heterogeneity in defining subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and allow identification of genetic determinants of emphysema severity and distribution. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify genes associated with CT scan distribution of emphysema in individuals without alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency but with severe COPD. METHODS: We evaluated baseline CT densitometry phenotypes in 282 individuals with emphysema enrolled in the Genetics Ancillary Study of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, and used regression models to identify genetic variants associated with emphysema distribution. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Emphysema distribution was assessed by two methods--assessment by radiologists and by computerized density mask quantitation, using a threshold of -950 Hounsfield units. A total of 77 polymorphisms in 20 candidate genes were analyzed for association with distribution of emphysema. GSTP1, EPHX1, and MMP1 polymorphisms were associated with the densitometric, apical-predominant distribution of emphysema (p value range = 0.001-0.050). When an apical-predominant phenotype was defined by the radiologist scoring method, GSTP1 and EPHX1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were found to be significantly associated. In a case-control analysis of COPD susceptibility limited to cases with densitometric upper-lobe-predominant cases, the EPHX1 His139Arg single-nucleotide polymorphism was associated with COPD (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Apical and basal emphysematous destruction appears to be influenced by different genes. Polymorphisms in the xenobiotic enzymes, GSTP1 and EPHX1, are associated with apical-predominant emphysema. Altered detoxification of cigarette smoke metabolites may contribute to emphysema distribution, and these findings may lead to further insight into genetic determinants of emphysema.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Computed tomography (CT) scanning of the lung may reduce phenotypic heterogeneity in defining subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and allow identification of genetic determinants of emphysema severity and distribution. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify genes associated with CT scan distribution of emphysema in individuals without alpha1-antitrypsindeficiency but with severe COPD. METHODS: We evaluated baseline CT densitometry phenotypes in 282 individuals with emphysema enrolled in the Genetics Ancillary Study of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, and used regression models to identify genetic variants associated with emphysema distribution. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Emphysema distribution was assessed by two methods--assessment by radiologists and by computerized density mask quantitation, using a threshold of -950 Hounsfield units. A total of 77 polymorphisms in 20 candidate genes were analyzed for association with distribution of emphysema. GSTP1, EPHX1, and MMP1 polymorphisms were associated with the densitometric, apical-predominant distribution of emphysema (p value range = 0.001-0.050). When an apical-predominant phenotype was defined by the radiologist scoring method, GSTP1 and EPHX1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were found to be significantly associated. In a case-control analysis of COPD susceptibility limited to cases with densitometric upper-lobe-predominant cases, the EPHX1 His139Arg single-nucleotide polymorphism was associated with COPD (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Apical and basal emphysematous destruction appears to be influenced by different genes. Polymorphisms in the xenobiotic enzymes, GSTP1 and EPHX1, are associated with apical-predominant emphysema. Altered detoxification of cigarette smoke metabolites may contribute to emphysema distribution, and these findings may lead to further insight into genetic determinants of emphysema.
Authors: Juan C Celedón; Christoph Lange; Benjamin A Raby; Augusto A Litonjua; Lyle J Palmer; Dawn L DeMeo; John J Reilly; David J Kwiatkowski; Harold A Chapman; Nan Laird; Jody S Sylvia; Melvin Hernandez; Frank E Speizer; Scott T Weiss; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2004-06-02 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Dan Xiao; Chen Wang; Min-jie Du; Bao-sen Pang; Hong-yu Zhang; Bai Xiao; Jing-zhong Liu; Xin-zhi Weng; Li Su; David C Christiani Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Seth T Bartel; Andrew J Bierhals; Thomas K Pilgram; Cheng Hong; Kenneth B Schechtman; Susan H Conradi; David S Gierada Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Adel Boueiz; Sharon M Lutz; Michael H Cho; Craig P Hersh; Russell P Bowler; George R Washko; Eitan Halper-Stromberg; Per Bakke; Amund Gulsvik; Nan M Laird; Terri H Beaty; Harvey O Coxson; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Peter J Castaldi; Dawn L DeMeo Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Michael H Cho; George R Washko; Thomas J Hoffmann; Gerard J Criner; Eric A Hoffman; Fernando J Martinez; Nan Laird; John J Reilly; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Respir Res Date: 2010-03-16
Authors: Ceri E Stewart; Ian P Hall; Stuart G Parker; Miriam F Moffat; Andrew J Wardlaw; Martin J Connolly; Charlotte Ruse; Ian Sayers Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2009-10-31 Impact factor: 2.103