Literature DB >> 17362952

Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: an eye-tracking study in men and women.

Heather A Rupp1, Kim Wallen.   

Abstract

Men and women exhibit different neural, genital, and subjective arousal responses to visual sexual stimuli. The source of these sex differences is unknown. We hypothesized that men and women look differently at sexual stimuli, resulting in different responses. We used eye tracking to measure looking by 15 male and 30 female (15 normal cycling (NC) and 15 oral contracepting (OC)) heterosexual adults viewing sexually explicit photos. NC Women were tested during their menstrual, periovulatory, and luteal phases while Men and OC Women were tested at equivalent intervals, producing three test sessions per individual. Men, NC, and OC Women differed in the relative amounts of first looks towards, percent time looking at, and probability of looking at, defined regions of the pictures. Men spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at female faces. NC Women had more first looks towards, spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at genitals. OC Women spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at contextual regions of pictures, those featuring clothing or background. Groups did not differ in looking at the female body. Menstrual cycle phase did not affect women's looking patterns. However, differences between OC and NC groups suggest hormonal influences on attention to sexual stimuli that were unexplained by subject characteristic differences. Our finding that men and women attend to different aspects of the same visual sexual stimuli could reflect pre-existing cognitive biases that possibly contribute to sex differences in neural, subjective, and physiological arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17362952     DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  32 in total

1.  Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski; Gail L Patricelli; Jason S Babcock; John M Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Oxytocin increases VTA activation to infant and sexual stimuli in nulliparous and postpartum women.

Authors:  Rebecca Gregory; Hu Cheng; Heather A Rupp; Dale R Sengelaub; Julia R Heiman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 3.  The neural basis of sex differences in sexual behavior: A quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Adam Safron; Danilo Bzdok; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  The µ-opioid system promotes visual attention to faces and eyes.

Authors:  Olga Chelnokova; Bruno Laeng; Guro Løseth; Marie Eikemo; Frode Willoch; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Love is in the gaze: an eye-tracking study of love and sexual desire.

Authors:  Mylene Bolmont; John T Cacioppo; Stephanie Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-07-16

Review 6.  Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-08-01

7.  Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-22

8.  Broad Autism Phenotypic Traits and the Relationship to Sexual Orientation and Sexual Behavior.

Authors:  Lydia R Qualls; Kathrin Hartmann; James F Paulson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-12

9.  Lower sexual interest in postpartum women: relationship to amygdala activation and intranasal oxytocin.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Thomas W James; Ellen D Ketterson; Dale R Sengelaub; Beate Ditzen; Julia R Heiman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Women gaze behaviour in assessing female bodies: the effects of clothing, body size, own body composition and body satisfaction.

Authors:  Amelia Cundall; Kun Guo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.