Literature DB >> 17362834

Sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase III, multicentre study.

Ian McKeith1, John O'Brien, Zuzana Walker, Klaus Tatsch, Jan Booij, Jacques Darcourt, Alessandro Padovani, Raffaele Giubbini, Ubaldo Bonuccelli, Duccio Volterrani, Clive Holmes, Paul Kemp, Naji Tabet, Ines Meyer, Cornelia Reininger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) needs to be distinguished from other types of dementia because of important differences in patient management and outcome. Current clinically based diagnostic criteria for DLB have limited accuracy. Severe nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration occurs in DLB, but not in Alzheimer's disease or most other dementia subtypes, offering a potential system for a biological diagnostic marker. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity, in the ante-mortem differentiation of probable DLB from other causes of dementia, of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) brain imaging with the ligand (123)I-2beta-carbometoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl) nortropane ((123)I-FP-CIT), which binds to the dopamine transporter (DAT) reuptake site. Diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and inter-reader agreement were the secondary endpoints and a subgroup of possible DLB patients was also included.
METHODS: We did a phase III study in which we used a (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT scan to assess 326 patients with clinical diagnoses of probable (n=94) or possible (n=57) DLB or non-DLB dementia (n=147) established by a consensus panel (in 28 patients no diagnosis could be made). Three readers, unaware of the clinical diagnosis, classified the images as normal or abnormal by visual inspection. The study had 90% power to detect the differences between our anticipated sensitivity (0.80) and specificity (0.85) targets and prespecified lower thresholds (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.73) using one-sided binomial tests with a significance level of alpha=0.025.
FINDINGS: Abnormal scans had a mean sensitivity of 77.7% for detecting clinical probable DLB, with specificity of 90.4% for excluding non-DLB dementia, which was predominantly due to Alzheimer's disease. A mean value of 85.7% was achieved for overall diagnostic accuracy, 82.4% for positive predictive value, and 87.5% for negative predictive value. Inter-reader agreement for rating scans as normal or abnormal was high (Cohen's kappa=0.87). The procedure was well tolerated with few adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: A revision of the International Consensus Criteria for DLB has recommended that low DAT uptake in the basal ganglia, as shown by SPECT or PET imaging, be a suggestive feature for diagnosis. Our findings confirm the high correlation between abnormal (low binding) DAT activity measured with (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT and a clinical diagnosis of probable DLB. The diagnostic accuracy is sufficiently high for this technique to be clinically useful in distinguishing DLB from Alzheimer's disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17362834     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70057-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  158 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging biomarkers for Parkinson disease: facts and fantasy.

Authors:  Joel S Perlmutter; Scott A Norris
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  Amyloid imaging as a biomarker for cerebral β-amyloidosis and risk prediction for Alzheimer dementia.

Authors:  William E Klunk
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Proposal for the standardisation of multi-centre trials in nuclear medicine imaging: prerequisites for a European 123I-FP-CIT SPECT database.

Authors:  John Caddell Dickson; Livia Tossici-Bolt; Terez Sera; Robin de Nijs; Jan Booij; Maria Claudia Bagnara; Anita Seese; Pierre Malick Koulibaly; Umit Ozgur Akdemir; Cathrine Jonsson; Michel Koole; Maria Raith; Markus Nowak Lonsdale; Jean George; Felicia Zito; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Dementia with lewy bodies: diagnosis and management for primary care providers.

Authors:  Melanie Zupancic; Aman Mahajan; Kamna Handa
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2011

5.  Is dopamine transporter invariably impaired at the time of diagnosis in dementia with Lewy bodies?

Authors:  Flavio Nobili; Dario Arnaldi; Silvia Morbelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Clinical Neurology and Epidemiology of the Major Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Michael G Erkkinen; Mee-Ohk Kim; Michael D Geschwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Emerging biomarkers in cognition.

Authors:  Meredith Wicklund; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.076

8.  Multivariate classification of patients with Alzheimer's and dementia with Lewy bodies using high-dimensional cortical thickness measurements: an MRI surface-based morphometric study.

Authors:  Alexander V Lebedev; E Westman; M K Beyer; M G Kramberger; C Aguilar; Z Pirtosek; D Aarsland
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  The cost effectiveness of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT imaging in patients with an uncertain clinical diagnosis of parkinsonism.

Authors:  Koen Van Laere; Ludwig Everaert; Lieven Annemans; Michel Gonce; Wim Vandenberghe; Thierry Vander Borght
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Molecular imaging of conscious, unrestrained mice with AwakeSPECT.

Authors:  Justin S Baba; Christopher J Endres; Catherine A Foss; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Hyeyun Jung; James S Goddard; Seungjoon Lee; John McKisson; Mark F Smith; Alexander V Stolin; Andrew G Weisenberger; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.