Literature DB >> 17361408

Tri-adcortyl ointment ear dressing in myringoplasty: an analysis of outcome.

O Anderson1, Y M Takwoingi.   

Abstract

In a retrospective study of patients who had undergone myringoplasty at our department within a 12-month period, we assessed the graft take rate using tri-adcortyl ointment (TAO) as ear dressing. Data including age, site and size of perforation, grade of surgeon, surgical approach, use of postoperative ear dressings, complications and audiometric outcome was collected from the patient notes and analysed. The overall success rate of the operation (with success being defined as an intact tympanic membrane at 6 months) was noted. Seventy-seven patients were operated, but data were complete on 64 patients and these constituted the study population. TAO was used in 95% of the patients and BIPP gauze pack in the remaining 5%. Age ranged from 8 to 63 years (mean 34 years). Mean follow-up period was 13 months. Most of the operations (72.88%) were carried out by consultants with a success rate of 89% and the remaining patients were operated by trainees with a success rate of 88% (P = 1.000). The overall success rate was 89, 90.16% for TAO and 66.66% (2 out of 3) for BIPP (P = 0.298), 95% for small and 86% for subtotal perforations (P = 0.573), 85% for anterior and 100% for posterior perforations (P = 0.240), 91% for adult patients and 88% for children (P = 1.000). TAO is a suitable ear dressing in myringoplasty. Routine use of TAO did not affect the success rate of myringoplasty at our centre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17361408     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0284-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

1.  BIPP--how does it work?

Authors:  A Nigam; M C Allwood
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1990-04

2.  The Pope Wick as a myringoplasty ear canal dressing.

Authors:  D McRae; M Dilkes; G Kenyon
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome.

Authors:  R Caylan; A Titiz; M Falcioni; G De Donato; A Russo; A Taibah; M Sanna
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  A randomized prospective trial to compare four different ear packs following permeatal middle ear surgery.

Authors:  H Zeitoun; G S Sandhu; M Kuo; M Macnamara
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty.

Authors:  K Onal; M Z Uguz; K C Kazikdas; S T Gursoy; H Gokce
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Myringoplasty for subtotal perforation.

Authors:  M W Yung
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-06

7.  Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?

Authors:  P Lee; G Kelly; R P Mills
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2002-10

8.  BIPP induced methaemoglobinaemia.

Authors:  A Nigam; J Ruddy; P E Robin
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Day-case myringoplasty: five years' experience.

Authors:  A Karkanevatos; S De; V R Srinivasan; N J Roland; T H J Lesser
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.469

10.  Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases.

Authors:  J L Sheehy; R G Anderson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.