Literature DB >> 17360922

Time course of precision in smooth-pursuit eye movements of monkeys.

Leslie C Osborne1, Sonja S Hohl, William Bialek, Stephen G Lisberger.   

Abstract

To evaluate the nature and possible sources of variation in sensory-motor behavior, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements as a function of time and computed thresholds that indicate how well the pursuit system discriminates small differences in the direction, speed, or time of onset of target motion. Thresholds improved rapidly as a function of time and came close to their minima during the interval when smooth eye movement is driven only by visual motion inputs. Many features of the data argued that motor output and sensory discrimination are limited by the same noise source. Pursuit thresholds reached magnitudes similar to those for perception: <2-3 degrees of direction, approximately 11-15% of target speed, and 8 ms of change in the time of onset of target motion. Pursuit and perceptual thresholds had similar dependencies on the duration of the motion stimulus and showed similar effects of target speed. The evolution of information about direction of target motion followed the same time course in pursuit behavior and in a previously reported sample of neuronal responses from extrastriate area MT. Changing the form of the sensory input while keeping the motor response fixed had significant effects on the signal-to-noise ratio in pursuit for direction discrimination, whereas holding the sensory input constant while changing the combination of muscles used for the motor output did not. We conclude that noise in sensory processing of visual motion provides the major source of variation in the initiation of pursuit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360922      PMCID: PMC2567916          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5072-06.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of pursuit eye movement and perceptual performance in speed discrimination.

Authors:  Karl R Gegenfurtner; Dajun Xing; Brian H Scott; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Reading a neural code.

Authors:  W Bialek; F Rieke; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck; D Warland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Correlation between speed perception and neural activity in the middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  Jing Liu; William T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Expression of motor learning in the response of the primate vestibuloocular reflex pathway to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D M Broussard; H M Brontë-Stewart; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements.

Authors:  C RASHBASS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  How is a sensory map read Out? Effects of microstimulation in visual area MT on saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  J M Groh; R T Born; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity.

Authors:  E Kowler; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Time course of information about motion direction in visual area MT of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Leslie C Osborne; William Bialek; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION.

Authors:  S Hecht; S Shlaer; M H Pirenne
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1942-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  32 in total

1.  Frequency dependence of vestibuloocular reflex thresholds.

Authors:  Csilla Haburcakova; Richard F Lewis; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Relationship between adapted neural population responses in MT and motion adaptation in speed and direction of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Dynamics of smooth pursuit maintenance.

Authors:  Abtine Tavassoli; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Adaptive-filter models of the cerebellum: computational analysis.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Spatial and temporal integration of visual motion signals for smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys.

Authors:  Leslie C Osborne; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Searching for simplicity in the analysis of neurons and behavior.

Authors:  Greg J Stephens; Leslie C Osborne; William Bialek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A neurally efficient implementation of sensory population decoding.

Authors:  Kris S Chaisanguanthum; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial precision of population activity in primate area MT.

Authors:  Spencer C Chen; John W Morley; Samuel G Solomon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Shared sensory estimates for human motion perception and pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Trishna Mukherjee; Matthew Battifarano; Claudio Simoncini; Leslie C Osborne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.