Literature DB >> 17360198

Modeling state-related fMRI activity using change-point theory.

Martin A Lindquist1, Christian Waugh, Tor D Wager.   

Abstract

The general linear model (GLM) approach has arguably become the dominant way to analyze functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. It tests whether activity in a brain region is systematically related to some known input function. However, the GLM becomes impractical when the precise timing and duration of psychological events cannot be specified a priori. In this work, we introduce a new analysis approach that allows the predicted signal to depend non-linearly on the input. The approach uses ideas from statistical control theory and change-point theory to model slowly varying processes for which the onset times and durations of underlying psychological activity are uncertain. Our approach is exploratory in nature, while retaining the inferential capabilities of the more rigid modeling approach. It is a multi-subject extension of the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) method used in change-point analysis. We extend existing EWMA models for individual subjects (a single time series) so that they are applicable to fMRI data, and develop a group analysis using a hierarchical model, which we term HEWMA (Hierarchical EWMA). The HEWMA method can be used to analyze fMRI data voxel-wise throughout the brain, data from regions of interest, or temporal components extracted using ICA or similar methods. We validate the false-positive rate control of the method and provide power estimates using simulations based on real fMRI data. We further apply this method to an fMRI study (n=24) of state anxiety. A toolbox implementing all functions in Matlab is freely available from the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360198     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Brain-State Extraction Algorithm Based on the State Transition (BEST): A Dynamic Functional Brain Network Analysis in fMRI Study.

Authors:  Young-Beom Lee; Kwangsun Yoo; Jee Hoon Roh; Won-Jin Moon; Yong Jeong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Neurophysiological studies of auditory verbal hallucinations.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Thomas Dierks; Derek J Fisher; Christoph S Herrmann; Daniela Hubl; Jochen Kindler; Thomas Koenig; Daniel H Mathalon; Kevin M Spencer; Werner Strik; Remko van Lutterveld
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Atomic dynamic functional interaction patterns for characterization of ADHD.

Authors:  Jinli Ou; Zhichao Lian; Li Xie; Xiang Li; Peng Wang; Yun Hao; Dajiang Zhu; Rongxin Jiang; Yufeng Wang; Yaowu Chen; Jing Zhang; Tianming Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Change point analysis for longitudinal physiological data: detection of cardio-respiratory changes preceding panic attacks.

Authors:  David Rosenfield; Enlu Zhou; Frank H Wilhelm; Ansgar Conrad; Walton T Roth; Alicia E Meuret
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  A few thoughts on brain ROIs.

Authors:  Tianming Liu
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Improved state change estimation in dynamic functional connectivity using hidden semi-Markov models.

Authors:  Heather Shappell; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  People are better at maintaining positive than negative emotional states.

Authors:  Christian E Waugh; Kristin E Running; Olivia C Reynolds; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-03-22

8.  Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: a comparison study and a new approach.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Yuting Xu; Mary Beth Nebel; Brain S Caffo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Ji Meng Loh; Lauren Y Atlas; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Change point estimation in multi-subject fMRI studies.

Authors:  Lucy F Robinson; Tor D Wager; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.