Literature DB >> 17357704

Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience.

Olga F Lazareva1, Edward A Wasserman, Irving Biederman.   

Abstract

DiPietro et al (2002 Perception 31 1299-1312) reported a dramatic improvement in pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects after the birds had been trained to recognize objects that were placed on top of another surface. Here, we investigated whether training with partially erased stimuli or with notched stimuli that had a thin gap between the object and another surface would similarly enhance pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects. We found that erased training had no effect on the birds' recognition of partially occluded objects. Training pigeons to recognize notched objects improved their performance with the same objects when they were partially occluded; but this improvement did not transfer to novel objects, a result that DiPietro et al reported after on-top training. Together, the present results and those of DiPietro et al implicate prior experience as a key factor in pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects. Training experiences which improve recognition of partially occluded objects may do so because they improve decomposition of complex two-dimensional scenes by pigeons into separate entities.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17357704     DOI: 10.1068/p5583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  5 in total

1.  Amodal completion of moving objects by pigeons.

Authors:  Yasuo Nagasaka; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

3.  Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Tracking of unpredictable moving stimuli by pigeons.

Authors:  Anna Wilkinson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.