Literature DB >> 17356802

New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity.

Gilles-Eric Séralini1, Dominique Cellier, Joël Spiroux de Vendomois.   

Abstract

Health risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) cultivated for food or feed is under debate throughout the world, and very little data have been published on mid- or long-term toxicological studies with mammals. One of these studies performed under the responsibility of Monsanto Company with a transgenic corn MON863 has been subjected to questions from regulatory reviewers in Europe, where it was finally approved in 2005. This necessitated a new assessment of kidney pathological findings, and the results remained controversial. An Appeal Court action in Germany (Münster) allowed public access in June 2005 to all the crude data from this 90-day rat-feeding study. We independently re-analyzed these data. Appropriate statistics were added, such as a multivariate analysis of the growth curves, and for biochemical parameters comparisons between GMO-treated rats and the controls fed with an equivalent normal diet, and separately with six reference diets with different compositions. We observed that after the consumption of MON863, rats showed slight but dose-related significant variations in growth for both sexes, resulting in 3.3% decrease in weight for males and 3.7% increase for females. Chemistry measurements reveal signs of hepatorenal toxicity, marked also by differential sensitivities in males and females. Triglycerides increased by 24-40% in females (either at week 14, dose 11% or at week 5, dose 33%, respectively); urine phosphorus and sodium excretions diminished in males by 31-35% (week 14, dose 33%) for the most important results significantly linked to the treatment in comparison to seven diets tested. Longer experiments are essential in order to indicate the real nature and extent of the possible pathology; with the present data it cannot be concluded that GM corn MON863 is a safe product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356802     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-006-0149-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  31 in total

1.  A 90-day subchronic feeding study of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab protein in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Huan Song; Xiaoyun He; Shiying Zou; Teng Zhang; Yunbo Luo; Kunlun Huang; Zhen Zhu; Wentao Xu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean: effects on liver ageing.

Authors:  Manuela Malatesta; Federica Boraldi; Giulia Annovi; Beatrice Baldelli; Serafina Battistelli; Marco Biggiogera; Daniela Quaglino
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 3.  EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Jaime Aguilera; Zoltán Diveki; Ana Gomes; Yi Liu; Claudia Paoletti; Patrick du Jardin; Lieve Herman; Joe N Perry; Elisabeth Waigmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Beyond risk. A more realistic risk-benefit analysis of agricultural biotechnologies.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Zahra Meghani
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Facing up to Complexity: Implications for Our Social Experiments.

Authors:  Ronnie Hawkins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Identification and validation of the wound and insect bite early inducible promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Devesh Kumar Mishra; Rakesh Srivastava; Bhoopendra K Pandey; Praveen Chandra Verma; Samir Vishwanath Sawant
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Debate on GMOs health risks after statistical findings in regulatory tests.

Authors:  Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; Dominique Cellier; Christian Vélot; Emilie Clair; Robin Mesnage; Gilles-Eric Séralini
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 8.  Food safety.

Authors:  Andrea Borchers; Suzanne S Teuber; Carl L Keen; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.667

9.  A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health.

Authors:  Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; François Roullier; Dominique Cellier; Gilles-Eric Séralini
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 10.  How subchronic and chronic health effects can be neglected for GMOs, pesticides or chemicals.

Authors:  Gilles-Eric Séralini; Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; Dominique Cellier; Charles Sultan; Marcello Buiatti; Lou Gallagher; Michael Antoniou; Krishna R Dronamraju
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.