Literature DB >> 17355417

Attitudes toward prenatal genetic testing in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Fay Kastrinos1, Elena M Stoffel, Judith Balmaña, Sapna Syngal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant syndrome with >95% risk of colorectal cancer without prophylactic colectomy. Classic FAP is commonly associated with adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene mutations. If a mutation is identified, prenatal testing can reveal whether an embryo or fetus is affected. We conducted a pilot study to assess FAP patients' attitudes toward prenatal testing.
METHODS: Twenty individuals with FAP completed a 40-item survey on personal and family history related to FAP, demographics, and attitudes toward prenatal tests including amniocentesis, chorionic villous sampling (CVS), and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
RESULTS: Thirteen women and seven men participated. Ninety-five percent (19/20) would consider undergoing prenatal testing for FAP: 90% would consider PGD, 75% would consider amniocentesis or CVS. Having an affected child and experiencing a first-degree relative's (FDR) death secondary to FAP were associated with greater willingness to consider prenatal testing. Personal history of cancer or FAP-associated tumors did not influence the decision to consider prenatal testing. One hundred percent said it was ethical to provide prenatal testing for FAP and four of five subjects who self-reported strong religious backgrounds would consider prenatal testing for FAP. Early reassurance of having an unaffected child was the most important advantage of PGD and avoiding pregnancy termination was important for 64% and 71% of women and men, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FAP are willing to consider prenatal testing to prevent transmission of disease to their children. Physicians caring for FAP patients should discuss available prenatal diagnostic options with patients of childbearing age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17355417     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  13 in total

1.  The challenge of developmentally appropriate care: predictive genetic testing in young people for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Rony E Duncan; Lynn Gillam; Julian Savulescu; Robert Williamson; John G Rogers; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Attitudes toward childbearing and prenatal testing in individuals undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Akriti Dewanwala; Anu Chittenden; Margery Rosenblatt; Rowena Mercado; Judy E Garber; Sapna Syngal; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF FAMILIES WITH HEREDITARY COLORECTAL CANCER SYNDROMES.

Authors:  Monica Dandapani; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Semin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-06-01

4.  Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and family planning: the attitude towards prenatal diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Margot G F van Lier; Susanne E Korsse; Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Ernst J Kuipers; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Kathleen Vanheusden; Monique E van Leerdam; Anja Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Comparison of attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis among patients with hereditary cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Thereasa A Rich; Mei Liu; Carol J Etzel; Sarah A Bannon; Maureen E Mork; Kaylene Ready; Devki S Saraiya; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Nancy D Perrier; Karen H Lu; Banu K Arun; Terri L Woodard; Leslie R Schover; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Parental attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions about genetic testing for FAP and colorectal cancer surveillance in minors.

Authors:  Fallon R Levine; James E Coxworth; David A Stevenson; Thérèse Tuohy; Randall W Burt; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions.

Authors:  Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Genetic counselors' perceived responsibilities regarding reproductive issues for patients at risk for Huntington disease.

Authors:  Karrie A Hines; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Half; Dani Bercovich; Paul Rozen
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Chantal Lammens; Eveline Bleiker; Neil Aaronson; Annette Vriends; Margreet Ausems; Maaike Jansweijer; Anja Wagner; Rolf Sijmons; Ans van den Ouweland; Rob van der Luijt; Liesbeth Spruijt; Encarna Gómez García; Mariëlle Ruijs; Senno Verhoef
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.