Literature DB >> 17355055

Single-trial classification of MEG recordings.

Marcos Perreau Guimaraes1, Dik Kin Wong, E Timothy Uy, Logan Grosenick, Patrick Suppes.   

Abstract

While magnetoencephalography (MEG) is widely used to identify spatial locations of brain activations associated with various tasks, classification of single trials in stimulus-locked experiments remains an open subject. Very significant single-trial classification results have been published using electroencephalogram (EEG) data, but in the MEG case, the weakness of the magnetic fields originating from the relevant sources relative to external noise, and the high dimensionality of the data are difficult obstacles to overcome. We present here very significant MEG single-trial mean classification rates of words. The number of words classified varied from seven to nine and both visual and auditory modalities were studied. These results were obtained by using a variety of blind sources separation methods: spatial principal components analysis (PCA), Infomax independent components analysis (Infomax ICA) and second-order blind identification (SOBI). The sources obtained were classified using two methods, linear discriminant classification (LDC) and v-support vector machine (v-SVM). The data used here, auditory and visual presentations of words, presented nontrivial classification problems, but with Infomax ICA associated with LDC we obtained high classification rates. Our best single-trial mean classification rate was 60.1% for classification of 900 single trials of nine auditory words. On two-class problems rates were as high as 97.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17355055     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2006.888824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  15 in total

1.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Decoding the neural representation of story meanings across languages.

Authors:  Morteza Dehghani; Reihane Boghrati; Kingson Man; Joe Hoover; Sarah I Gimbel; Ashish Vaswani; Jason D Zevin; Mary Helen Immordino-Yang; Andrew S Gordon; Antonio Damasio; Jonas T Kaplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances.

Authors:  Jonathan S Brumberg; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  PyMVPA: A python toolbox for multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Michael Hanke; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Per B Sederberg; Stephen José Hanson; James V Haxby; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28

5.  The dynamics of invariant object recognition in the human visual system.

Authors:  Leyla Isik; Ethan M Meyers; Joel Z Leibo; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Tracking neural coding of perceptual and semantic features of concrete nouns.

Authors:  Gustavo Sudre; Dean Pomerleau; Mark Palatucci; Leila Wehbe; Alona Fyshe; Riitta Salmelin; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Structural similarities between brain and linguistic data provide evidence of semantic relations in the brain.

Authors:  Colleen E Crangle; Marcos Perreau-Guimaraes; Patrick Suppes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Representational Similarity Analysis of the Dynamics of Object Processing Using Single-Trial EEG Classification.

Authors:  Blair Kaneshiro; Marcos Perreau Guimaraes; Hyung-Suk Kim; Anthony M Norcia; Patrick Suppes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automated analysis of cellular signals from large-scale calcium imaging data.

Authors:  Eran A Mukamel; Axel Nimmerjahn; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method.

Authors:  J-R King; S Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.