Literature DB >> 17355033

A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks.

David J Bennett1, Quoc C Vuong.   

Abstract

In four experiments, we examined whether generalization to unfamiliar views was better under stereo viewing or under nonstereo viewing across different tasks and stimuli. In the first three experiments, we used a sequential matching task in which observers matched the identities of shaded tube-like objects. Across Experiments 1-3, we manipulated the presentation method of the nonstereo stimuli (having observers wear an eye patch vs. showing observers the same screen image) and the magnitude of the viewpoint change (30 degrees vs. 38 degrees). In Experiment 4, observers identified "easy" and "hard" rotating wire-frame objects at the individual level under stereo and nonstereo viewing conditions. We found a stereo advantage for generalizing to unfamiliar views in all the experiments. However, in these experiments, performance remained view dependent even under stereo viewing. These results strongly argue against strictly 2-D image-based models of object recognition, at least for the stimuli and recognition tasks used, and suggest that observers used representations that contained view-specific local depth information.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17355033     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Measuring sensitivity to viewpoint change with and without stereoscopic cues.

Authors:  Jason Bell; Edwin Dickinson; David R Badcock; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; William G Hayward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

3.  Functional architecture for disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex and its relationship to the architecture for faces, color, scenes, and visual field.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Kaitlin S Bohon; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Infant imitation from television using novel touch screen technology.

Authors:  Elizabeth Zack; Rachel Barr; Peter Gerhardstein; Kelly Dickerson; Andrew N Meltzoff
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2009-03

5.  On the contribution of binocular disparity to the long-term memory for natural scenes.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stereoscopic Offset Makes Objects Easier to Recognize.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search.

Authors:  Roshani Gnanaseelan; Dave A Gonzalez; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Daniel Yamins; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Stereo viewing modulates three-dimensional shape processing during object recognition: A high-density ERP study.

Authors:  Zoe J Oliver; Filipe Cristino; Mark V Roberts; Alan J Pegna; E Charles Leek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.