BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vascularity, metabolism, and histologic grade are related in gliomas but the exact determinants of these relationships are not fully defined. We used image coregistration and stereotactic biopsies to regionally compare cerebral blood volume (CBV) and (11)C-methionine (MET) uptake measurements in brain gliomas and to assess their relationship by histopathologic examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with brain gliomas underwent MR imaging, including dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR and positron-emission tomography (PET) using MET acquired in identical stereotactic conditions before biopsy. MR-based CBV maps were calculated and both CBV maps and PET images were coregistered to anatomic images. Sixty-five biopsy samples were obtained on trajectories targeted toward high MET uptake area. The following histopathologic features were semiquantified in each sample: mitotic activity, endothelial proliferation, cellular pleomorphism, and tumor necrosis. CBV and MET uptake values were measured in the biopsy area and normalized to contralateral white matter. CBV ratios were compared with MET uptake ratios, and both measurements were compared with histologic features of each sample. RESULTS: CBV ratios ranged from 0.08 to 10.24 (median = 1.73), and MET uptake ratios ranged from 0.30 to 4.91 (median = 1.67). There was a positive correlation between CBV ratios and MET uptake ratios (r = 0.65, P < .001). Both CBV and MET uptake ratios were found to be significantly related to endothelial proliferation and mitotic activity (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Within glial tumors, there is a local relationship between CBV and MET uptake measurements. Both provide indices of focal malignant activity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vascularity, metabolism, and histologic grade are related in gliomas but the exact determinants of these relationships are not fully defined. We used image coregistration and stereotactic biopsies to regionally compare cerebral blood volume (CBV) and (11)C-methionine (MET) uptake measurements in brain gliomas and to assess their relationship by histopathologic examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with brain gliomas underwent MR imaging, including dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR and positron-emission tomography (PET) using MET acquired in identical stereotactic conditions before biopsy. MR-based CBV maps were calculated and both CBV maps and PET images were coregistered to anatomic images. Sixty-five biopsy samples were obtained on trajectories targeted toward high MET uptake area. The following histopathologic features were semiquantified in each sample: mitotic activity, endothelial proliferation, cellular pleomorphism, and tumor necrosis. CBV and MET uptake values were measured in the biopsy area and normalized to contralateral white matter. CBV ratios were compared with MET uptake ratios, and both measurements were compared with histologic features of each sample. RESULTS: CBV ratios ranged from 0.08 to 10.24 (median = 1.73), and MET uptake ratios ranged from 0.30 to 4.91 (median = 1.67). There was a positive correlation between CBV ratios and MET uptake ratios (r = 0.65, P < .001). Both CBV and MET uptake ratios were found to be significantly related to endothelial proliferation and mitotic activity (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Within glial tumors, there is a local relationship between CBV and MET uptake measurements. Both provide indices of focal malignant activity.
Authors: S Goldman; M Levivier; B Pirotte; J M Brucher; D Wikler; P Damhaut; S Dethy; J Brotchi; J Hildebrand Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: P van Gelderen; N F Ramsey; G Liu; J H Duyn; J A Frank; D R Weinberger; C T Moonen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-07-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lutz W Kracht; Michael Friese; Karl Herholz; Roland Schroeder; Bernd Bauer; Andreas Jacobs; Wolf-Dieter Heiss Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-04-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julie H Harreld; Mikhail Doubrovin; Elizabeth R Butch; Angela Edwards; Barry Shulkin Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Francesco Cicone; Christian P Filss; Giuseppe Minniti; Camilla Rossi-Espagnet; Annalisa Papa; Claudia Scaringi; Norbert Galldiks; Alessandro Bozzao; N Jon Shah; Francesco Scopinaro; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: S J Mills; C Soh; J P B O'Connor; C J Rose; G Buonaccorsi; S Cheung; S Zhao; G J M Parker; A Jackson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.825