AIM: To determine if proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis in human cholangiocarcinoma cells, and if so, to elucidate the cellular mechanisms. METHODS: Studies were performed in the human KMCH, KMBC, and Mz-ChA-1 cholangiocarcinoma, and normal rat cell lines. MG132, a peptide aldehyde, which inhibits the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was employed for this study. Apoptosis was assessed morphologically by 4'-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) nuclear staining and fluorescence microscopy. Mitochondrial membrane potential was examined using a fluorescent unquenching assay. Ultrastructural changes during cell death were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Caspase 3/7 activity was assessed using an enzymatic-based fluorescent assay. Cytosolic-free calcium concentrations were measured using Fura-2 and digitized fluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, induced apoptosis in all the cholangiocarcinoma cell lines examined. In contrast, minimal cytotoxicity was observed in normal rat cholangiocytes. Apoptosis was time- and -concentration-dependent. There was no change in the mitochondrial membrane potential between treated and untreated cells. Ultrastructural examination by transmission electron microscopy displayed the classic features of apoptosis, but in addition, there was also dramatic vacuolization of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Unexpectedly, no increase in caspase 3/7 activity was observed in MG132 treated cells, nor did the pancaspase inhibitor, Q-VD-OPh prevent cell death. The protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, blocked apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibitor indicating that ER dysfunction was dependent upon the formation of new proteins. CONCLUSION: Proteasome inhibition induces ER dysfunction and caspase-independent cell death selectively in human cholangiocarcinoma cells. Proteasome inhibitors warrant evaluation as anticancer agents for the treatment of human cholangiocarcinoma.
AIM: To determine if proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis in humancholangiocarcinoma cells, and if so, to elucidate the cellular mechanisms. METHODS: Studies were performed in the human KMCH, KMBC, and Mz-ChA-1 cholangiocarcinoma, and normal rat cell lines. MG132, a peptide aldehyde, which inhibits the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was employed for this study. Apoptosis was assessed morphologically by 4'-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) nuclear staining and fluorescence microscopy. Mitochondrial membrane potential was examined using a fluorescent unquenching assay. Ultrastructural changes during cell death were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Caspase 3/7 activity was assessed using an enzymatic-based fluorescent assay. Cytosolic-free calcium concentrations were measured using Fura-2 and digitized fluorescent microscopy. RESULTS:MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, induced apoptosis in all the cholangiocarcinoma cell lines examined. In contrast, minimal cytotoxicity was observed in normal rat cholangiocytes. Apoptosis was time- and -concentration-dependent. There was no change in the mitochondrial membrane potential between treated and untreated cells. Ultrastructural examination by transmission electron microscopy displayed the classic features of apoptosis, but in addition, there was also dramatic vacuolization of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Unexpectedly, no increase in caspase 3/7 activity was observed in MG132 treated cells, nor did the pancaspase inhibitor, Q-VD-OPh prevent cell death. The protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, blocked apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibitor indicating that ER dysfunction was dependent upon the formation of new proteins. CONCLUSION: Proteasome inhibition induces ER dysfunction and caspase-independent cell death selectively in humancholangiocarcinoma cells. Proteasome inhibitors warrant evaluation as anticancer agents for the treatment of humancholangiocarcinoma.
Authors: W R Jarnagin; Y Fong; R P DeMatteo; M Gonen; E C Burke; J Bodniewicz BS; M Youssef BA; D Klimstra; L H Blumgart Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; Sundar Jagannath; David Irwin; S Vincent Rajkumar; Gordan Srkalovic; Melissa Alsina; Raymond Alexanian; David Siegel; Robert Z Orlowski; David Kuter; Steven A Limentani; Stephanie Lee; Teru Hideshima; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Michael Kauffman; Julian Adams; David P Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nicholas Mitsiades; Constantine S Mitsiades; Vassiliki Poulaki; Dharminder Chauhan; Galinos Fanourakis; Xuesong Gu; Charles Bailey; Marie Joseph; Towia A Libermann; Steven P Treon; Nikhil C Munshi; Paul G Richardson; Teru Hideshima; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-10-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Victoria Cavaliere; Daniela L Papademetrio; Tomás Lombardo; Susana N Costantino; Guillermo A Blanco; Elida M C Alvarez Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Crystal S Denlinger; Neal J Meropol; Tianyu Li; Nancy L Lewis; Paul F Engstrom; Louis M Weiner; Jonathan D Cheng; R Katherine Alpaugh; Harry Cooper; John J Wright; Steven J Cohen Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Lei Wang; Yang Yu; Dar-Chone Chow; Fei Yan; Chih-Chao Hsu; Fabio Stossi; Michael A Mancini; Timothy Palzkill; Lan Liao; Suoling Zhou; Jianming Xu; David M Lonard; Bert W O'Malley Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 31.743