Literature DB >> 17351365

How to assess mean blood pressure properly at the brachial artery level.

Willem J W Bos1, Elisabeth Verrij, Hieronymus H Vincent, Berend E Westerhof, Gianfranco Parati, Gert A van Montfrans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mean arterial pressure at the upper arm is traditionally calculated by adding one-third of the pulse pressure to the diastolic pressure. We questioned the general validity of this formula.
METHODS: We used previously recorded resting intrabrachial pressure and Riva-Rocci Korotkoff blood pressure measurements in 57 subjects (study A) and 24-h intra-arterial recordings obtained in 22 ambulant subjects (study B).
RESULTS: In study A the intra-arterially measured 'real' mean pressure was found at 39.5 +/- 2.5% of pulse pressure above diastolic pressure, namely at a level higher than the expected 33.3% of pulse pressure, in all individuals. Results were not related to age, blood pressure, pulse pressure or heart rate levels. Mean pressure calculated with the traditional one-third rule therefore underestimated 'real' mean pressure by 5.0 +/- 2.3 mmHg (P < 0.01) when calculated from intra-arterial pressure readings, and by 4.9 +/- 5.3 mmHg (P < 0.01) when calculated from Riva-Rocci Korotkoff readings. In study B we showed activity-related variations in the relative level of the 'real' mean pressure, which increased by 1.8 +/- 1.4% (P < 0.01) during sleep, and decreased by 0.5 +/- 0.9% during walking (P < 0.05) and by 0.8 +/- 1.3% during cycling (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The mean pressure at the upper arm is underestimated when calculated using the traditional formula of adding one-third of the pulse pressure to the diastolic pressure. This underestimation can be avoided by adding 40% of pulse pressure to the diastolic pressure. The proposed approach needs to be validated through larger scale studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17351365     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32803fb621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  35 in total

1.  Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  Dingchang Zheng; John N Amoore; Stephan Mieke; Alan Murray
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification.

Authors:  Isabelle Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan Kips; Sebastian Vermeersch; Luc Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The influence of tocolytic drugs on cardiac function, large arteries, and resistance vessels.

Authors:  Isabelle G Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan G Kips; Luc M Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Influence of Age on Upper Arm Cuff Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Dean S Picone; Martin G Schultz; Petr Otahal; J Andrew Black; Willem J Bos; Chen-Huan Chen; Hao-Min Cheng; Antoine Cremer; Nathan Dwyer; Ricardo Fonseca; Alun D Hughes; Hack-Lyoung Kim; Peter S Lacy; Esben Laugesen; Nobuyuki Ohte; Stefano Omboni; Christian Ott; Telmo Pereira; Giacomo Pucci; Philip Roberts-Thomson; Niklas B Rossen; Roland E Schmieder; Daisuke Sueta; Kenji Takazawa; Jiguang Wang; Thomas Weber; Berend E Westerhof; Bryan Williams; Hirotsugu Yamada; Eiichiro Yamamoto; James E Sharman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Does Measurement of Central Blood Pressure have Treatment Consequences in the Clinical Praxis?

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Difference in the risk profiles of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: results from two community-based studies in China and Sweden.

Authors:  Qian-Hui Guo; Iram Faqir Muhammad; Yan Borné; Chang-Sheng Sheng; Margaretha Persson; Ji-Guang Wang; Gunnar Engström; Yan Li; Peter M Nilsson
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Mean arterial pressure values calculated using seven different methods and their associations with target organ deterioration in a single-center study of 1878 individuals.

Authors:  Theodore G Papaioannou; Athanase D Protogerou; Dimitrios Vrachatis; Giorgos Konstantonis; Evaggelia Aissopou; Antonis Argyris; Efthimia Nasothimiou; Elias J Gialafos; Marianna Karamanou; Dimitris Tousoulis; Petros P Sfikakis
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Smartphone-based blood pressure monitoring via the oscillometric finger-pressing method.

Authors:  Anand Chandrasekhar; Chang-Sei Kim; Mohammed Naji; Keerthana Natarajan; Jin-Oh Hahn; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Aortic-to-brachial artery stiffness gradient is not blood pressure independent.

Authors:  Matthew K Armstrong; Martin G Schultz; Dean S Picone; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Arterial pulse wave velocity and cognition with advancing age.

Authors:  Merrill F Elias; Michael A Robbins; Marc M Budge; Walter P Abhayaratna; Gregory A Dore; Penelope K Elias
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.